Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
How do you do creation science research?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Loudmouth" data-source="post: 58567881" data-attributes="member: 11790"><p>You also need to show that these different mechanisms and processes were responsible for the formation, that they actually exist, and be able to differentiate them from the processes that produce a similar formation at slower rates.</p><p> </p><p>So what type of geologic formation would be inconsistent with a 10 myo Earth? What type of formation could these mechanisms and processes not produce? </p><p> </p><p>If your theory is unfalsifiable you need to go back to the drawing board. One of the most important steps in designing a scientific research program is determining what your null hypothesis is. You have to be able to show other scientists that you are able to detect false positives if they exist. The placebo effect is a good example of this. In drug studies, some of the subjects are given a sugar pill. If the drug under investigation has the same or lesser effect than the sugar pill then the drug effect is considered a false positive.</p><p> </p><p>You also need to construct a dating method of some kind that is objective and justifiable.</p><p> </p><p></p><p> </p><p>Science is not the process of saying that a theory is falsified. It is about DEMONSTRATING that a theory is falsified. Within the scientific arena, once you have falsified evolution you still need to support creationism with positive evidence. This may not be the case in the theological arena, but it is this way in the scientific arena.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Loudmouth, post: 58567881, member: 11790"] You also need to show that these different mechanisms and processes were responsible for the formation, that they actually exist, and be able to differentiate them from the processes that produce a similar formation at slower rates. So what type of geologic formation would be inconsistent with a 10 myo Earth? What type of formation could these mechanisms and processes not produce? If your theory is unfalsifiable you need to go back to the drawing board. One of the most important steps in designing a scientific research program is determining what your null hypothesis is. You have to be able to show other scientists that you are able to detect false positives if they exist. The placebo effect is a good example of this. In drug studies, some of the subjects are given a sugar pill. If the drug under investigation has the same or lesser effect than the sugar pill then the drug effect is considered a false positive. You also need to construct a dating method of some kind that is objective and justifiable. Science is not the process of saying that a theory is falsified. It is about DEMONSTRATING that a theory is falsified. Within the scientific arena, once you have falsified evolution you still need to support creationism with positive evidence. This may not be the case in the theological arena, but it is this way in the scientific arena. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
How do you do creation science research?
Top
Bottom