Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
How do you decide if something is factual?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pshun2404" data-source="post: 71777868" data-attributes="member: 301030"><p><em><strong>My 'challenge' was to look at the genes that YOU chose as apparent examples of evolutionist dishonesty to see whether or not their disparate lengths were due to them having not been equally sequenced.</strong></em></p><p></p><p>MOST evolutionists are not dishonest, just convinced before they interpret (this influences their conclusions). And yes this is just like MOST Creationists you are correct and I agree. </p><p></p><p>Now whether or not the "disparate lengths" were due to not being equally sequenced (which they obviously are not) is irrelevant to what establishes something (in each person's opinion) as factual (yo know the OP?). In this case in this discussion, they are NOT the same gene regardless of what means they use to determine "same" as factual. </p><p></p><p>They are structurally DIFFERENT, and have different functions in each respective organism. So "same" is not factual...<em>DIFFERENT IS</em>. In my example, the basis for determining what constitutes "factual" is the actual observable data, as opposed to the narrative attached to explain the reality in light of the hypothesis (like many creationists do). Also it appears you are blurring threads...with the probability thread...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pshun2404, post: 71777868, member: 301030"] [I][B]My 'challenge' was to look at the genes that YOU chose as apparent examples of evolutionist dishonesty to see whether or not their disparate lengths were due to them having not been equally sequenced.[/B][/I] MOST evolutionists are not dishonest, just convinced before they interpret (this influences their conclusions). And yes this is just like MOST Creationists you are correct and I agree. Now whether or not the "disparate lengths" were due to not being equally sequenced (which they obviously are not) is irrelevant to what establishes something (in each person's opinion) as factual (yo know the OP?). In this case in this discussion, they are NOT the same gene regardless of what means they use to determine "same" as factual. They are structurally DIFFERENT, and have different functions in each respective organism. So "same" is not factual...[I]DIFFERENT IS[/I]. In my example, the basis for determining what constitutes "factual" is the actual observable data, as opposed to the narrative attached to explain the reality in light of the hypothesis (like many creationists do). Also it appears you are blurring threads...with the probability thread... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
How do you decide if something is factual?
Top
Bottom