Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
How did we get our moon?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Huram Abi" data-source="post: 58955699"><p>I don't have one. I think it is an unnecessary label that is also misused.</p><p> </p><p>Cupid Dave has appendixed his theology into scripture and has called it "The theistic evolution bible interpretation." But what he doesn't understand is that the label's intent is an absolute rejection of Genesis in a literal sense. </p><p> </p><p>I guess, as I am forming this opinion just now, that a "theistic evolutionist" is a person who overcomplicates who they are. They can just say "non-literalist." If they don't believe that Genesis says anything scientific, then scientific terms should not be used to describe the belief, because it confuses their identity with something that, they themselves purport, is not relevant to the content of the bible.</p><p> </p><p>It's a non-useful term.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Huram Abi, post: 58955699"] I don't have one. I think it is an unnecessary label that is also misused. Cupid Dave has appendixed his theology into scripture and has called it "The theistic evolution bible interpretation." But what he doesn't understand is that the label's intent is an absolute rejection of Genesis in a literal sense. I guess, as I am forming this opinion just now, that a "theistic evolutionist" is a person who overcomplicates who they are. They can just say "non-literalist." If they don't believe that Genesis says anything scientific, then scientific terms should not be used to describe the belief, because it confuses their identity with something that, they themselves purport, is not relevant to the content of the bible. It's a non-useful term. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
How did we get our moon?
Top
Bottom