You keep forgetting: no bad teachers, just bad students.
Does he have to teach something that makes sense?On one condition: The teacher must teach something (new).
Does he have to teach something that makes sense?
The idea that inanimate objects have desires fits quite well in Aristotelean physics, in which things have natural places to which they strive to return. It did not prove to be a fruitful way of understanding the detailed behavior of, well, anything, and was replaced several centuries ago. Odd to see it reappear now.
Organisms don't "steer" their evolution.
2 fish are swimming by the coast.
They see humans sunbath on the beach.
One says to the other "how nuts!!! don't they realise that they will die there????"
This is the price to pay by not accepting the fact of evolution.
Incorrect. Modern physics was invented by people who fully accepted the idea of creation. The problem with Aristotelian physics is that it isn't a good description of physical reality.This is the price to pay by not accepting the idea of creation.
They tried to take physics too far. It doesn't go to creation.Incorrect. Modern physics was invented by people who fully accepted the idea of creation. The problem with Aristotelian physics is that it isn't a good description of physical reality.
How did these life evolved out?
Nothing "wants" to evolve. There is no consciousness or volition involved. It is what happens when conditions are right.
They DO.
Exactly. You do can say that to all fishes.
that's because so called "creation" is not part of the natural world, therefore outside the realm of science.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?