Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
How can supporting Roy Moore be consistent with Christianity?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SoldierOfTheKing" data-source="post: 72156242" data-attributes="member: 136506"><p>Certainly it does. It is after all, the truth.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is precisely what I'm talking about. All matter of sexual deviancy, normalized, but Roy Moore, who was looking for a woman to be his wife and God willing, have chuldren with, he's a pervert.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>"Objectifying women" is not in my vocabulary, but if the feminist Puritans who use is simply mean "lust", I wonder why they don't simply say "lust". In the case on Matthew 5:27-28, he is commenting on Seventh Commandment. He is talking about looking on a woman in a manner which which would be appropriate if she was your wife, but outside of marriage is adultery. That is what extramarital affairs start with.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>...or be mature enough not to care about his personal life.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If he owns the property, and owns the event, then actually he can. It's part of the job. Not saying it's right, I'm not really a fan of beauty pageants either, but it's what those ladies signed up for. Given that this guy ran strip clubs in his casinos, there's no reason why this should come as a shocker.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Is that not sufficient purpose for you? To protect the accused's right to due process?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SoldierOfTheKing, post: 72156242, member: 136506"] Certainly it does. It is after all, the truth. This is precisely what I'm talking about. All matter of sexual deviancy, normalized, but Roy Moore, who was looking for a woman to be his wife and God willing, have chuldren with, he's a pervert. "Objectifying women" is not in my vocabulary, but if the feminist Puritans who use is simply mean "lust", I wonder why they don't simply say "lust". In the case on Matthew 5:27-28, he is commenting on Seventh Commandment. He is talking about looking on a woman in a manner which which would be appropriate if she was your wife, but outside of marriage is adultery. That is what extramarital affairs start with. ...or be mature enough not to care about his personal life. If he owns the property, and owns the event, then actually he can. It's part of the job. Not saying it's right, I'm not really a fan of beauty pageants either, but it's what those ladies signed up for. Given that this guy ran strip clubs in his casinos, there's no reason why this should come as a shocker. Is that not sufficient purpose for you? To protect the accused's right to due process? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
How can supporting Roy Moore be consistent with Christianity?
Top
Bottom