Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
How Can Molecules Think?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="doubtingmerle" data-source="post: 76914299" data-attributes="member: 6687"><p>Uh, before you explain why I am wrong, why not first look at what I had to say? Proverbs 18:13 says, "He that giveth answer before he heareth, It is folly and shame unto him. " Do you agree that it is wrong to give an answer before you hear it?</p><p></p><p>You are responding to the OP where I say,</p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><p style="margin-left: 20px"> As I wrote at <a href="https://mindsetfree.blog/dare-to-question/is-there-life-after-death/" target="_blank">Is There Life after Death</a>, there is abundant evidence that the physical brain is indeed the thing that thinks. There is no soul inside running the show. The brain is in control. Your brain does the thinking.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> </p><p>So you are responding to a place where I tell you there is abundant evidence, and I give a link to a place where I have described that evidence in in detail. And how is it that you knew that this was simply a leap of faith for me? For that is the exact opposite of what I said. And how is it you knew I was wrong? Since you represent me as saying the opposite of what I said, my guess is you never read it. How can you give an answer without hearing it?</p><p></p><p>So, would it be too much to ask that you read what I say before declaring publicly that I am wrong and declaring publicly that my reasoning is the opposite to what I actually say?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="doubtingmerle, post: 76914299, member: 6687"] Uh, before you explain why I am wrong, why not first look at what I had to say? Proverbs 18:13 says, "He that giveth answer before he heareth, It is folly and shame unto him. " Do you agree that it is wrong to give an answer before you hear it? You are responding to the OP where I say, [INDENT][INDENT] As I wrote at [URL='https://mindsetfree.blog/dare-to-question/is-there-life-after-death/']Is There Life after Death[/URL], there is abundant evidence that the physical brain is indeed the thing that thinks. There is no soul inside running the show. The brain is in control. Your brain does the thinking. [/INDENT][/INDENT] So you are responding to a place where I tell you there is abundant evidence, and I give a link to a place where I have described that evidence in in detail. And how is it that you knew that this was simply a leap of faith for me? For that is the exact opposite of what I said. And how is it you knew I was wrong? Since you represent me as saying the opposite of what I said, my guess is you never read it. How can you give an answer without hearing it? So, would it be too much to ask that you read what I say before declaring publicly that I am wrong and declaring publicly that my reasoning is the opposite to what I actually say? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
How Can Molecules Think?
Top
Bottom