Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
How Can Molecules Think?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Mountainmike" data-source="post: 76904275" data-attributes="member: 392252"><p>A far more pertinent book is "after" by Greyson himself.</p><p>Explains the evidence that persuaded him to pursue the phenomena.</p><p></p><p></p><p>"twin telepathy" playfair is an interesting book - in which the author is annoyed by the refusal of academia to investigate because of prejudice.</p><p></p><p>It has always struck me as fascinating that those with clearly defined negative views never want to take up the challenge to rebut phenomena which should be easy if it is such a slamdunk in their view!</p><p></p><p>Tesoriero lists at least 3 academic institutions that refused to investigate eucharistic miracle samples (in this case just to do routine DNA or rissue morphology and pathology studies) having told him they "must be fraud"!!!,</p><p> one university noted "this department is founded on Darwinian thought, we might have to close if you are right!" </p><p></p><p>Others tried to gag scientists who had commented positively on them.</p><p>I am guessing it is a blight on a career JUST to get involved. </p><p>My conclusion is academia is scared of what it might find .</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Mountainmike, post: 76904275, member: 392252"] A far more pertinent book is "after" by Greyson himself. Explains the evidence that persuaded him to pursue the phenomena. "twin telepathy" playfair is an interesting book - in which the author is annoyed by the refusal of academia to investigate because of prejudice. It has always struck me as fascinating that those with clearly defined negative views never want to take up the challenge to rebut phenomena which should be easy if it is such a slamdunk in their view! Tesoriero lists at least 3 academic institutions that refused to investigate eucharistic miracle samples (in this case just to do routine DNA or rissue morphology and pathology studies) having told him they "must be fraud"!!!, one university noted "this department is founded on Darwinian thought, we might have to close if you are right!" Others tried to gag scientists who had commented positively on them. I am guessing it is a blight on a career JUST to get involved. My conclusion is academia is scared of what it might find . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
How Can Molecules Think?
Top
Bottom