• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Homosexuality, why it is a mental defect.

BAFRIEND

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2007
15,847
1,173
✟23,362.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
God did not make people gay. Left handed ? Brown eyes ? ... I said a defect. More like being born without arms.
 
Upvote 0

BAFRIEND

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2007
15,847
1,173
✟23,362.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Tulc, how about this ? This was from Damogh in a thread from 7-2-07:


Now, this person is a homosexual and his inferiorities are the cause, according to him, why he developed a same sex attraction.

The question is though, can a person who developed a fixation on his peers due to feeling of insuperiority, really grow up to be normal ?
 
Upvote 0

tulc

loves "SO'S YER MOM!! posts!
May 18, 2002
49,401
18,804
69
✟279,100.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Now, this person is a homosexual and his inferiorities are the cause, according to him, why he developed a same sex attraction.

Uhmmm so people who were insecure grow up to be gay? There must be a lot more around then 3% then, because I don't know anyone who wasn't insecure growing up...unless there was something else that contributed to him becoming gay?
The question is though, can a person who developed a fixation on his peers due to feeling of insuperiority, really grow up to be normal ? (emph. added)
Well if you can define "normal" in such a way as to cover every aspect of it you might be on to something, until then normal really is just a setting on a washing machine.
tulc(who got a plush Cthulhu for his birthday!)
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Now, this person is a homosexual and his inferiorities are the cause, according to him, why he developed a same sex attraction.
Perhaps, but are you suggesting that, because of the testimony of this (alleged) homosexual, all homosexuals are 'that way' because of their insecurities and/or peer fixation?

The question is though, can a person who developed a fixation on his peers due to feeling of insuperiority, really grow up to be normal?
Well, yes. Only feral children grow up without peers to fixate upon, and no person grows up without insecurities of one form or another.

And I await your response to my previous post on page 2, BAFRIEND.
 
Upvote 0
B

BigBadWlf

Guest
OK, here are my thoughts, and they are based on a Dutch doctor that has had a private psychotherapeutic practice since 1963.

An unnamed individual is hardly a reliable source for any claim

An unnamed individual writing before either of us were born is hardly impressive as evidence.



I see multiple unsubstantiated claims here.
What age specifically?
Where is the evidence for this “negative comparison”?
Where is the evidence for the claim of “idolize”?
Where is the evidence for the claim of prevalence that is being made?

To what studies is he referring to?



All in all it sounds more like someone with a pet theory and nothing to support it
 
Upvote 0

lmnop9876

Well-Known Member
Aug 29, 2005
6,970
224
✟8,364.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
the jury is still out on whether same-sex attraction has neurological, neurochemical, or psychological bases. what seems most likely to me is that there are a number of complex neurochemical, endocrinal, hormonal, and neuroanatomical factors which interact to create the biological base from which homosexuality may develop if the individual is exposed to certain environmental or developmental factors during key stages of their psychosexual and psychosocial development.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
How can you prove it, though?
  • God made him who he is.
  • He is gay.
  • Therefore, God made him gay.
The first premise is more his personal belief than a fact, much less an empiracle one. Nevertheless, within the Christian tradition of 'made in his image', his words ring true.
 
Upvote 0

OllieFranz

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2007
5,328
351
✟31,048.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
If you're not sure, wouldn't it be better to abstain even if it MAY be sin?

Yes, if you have any doubts, then for you it is sin. Until you are sure, you should assume it is sinful and avoid the activity. (Which is why I quoted 1 Corinthians 8 and referenced Romans 14 and Colossians 2)

But the way to clear up your doubts is to study and pray and be guided by the Holy Spirit. And my study and prayer and reliance on the Holy Spirit have shown me that there are only four passages which are relevant to the question of whether all forms of same-sex activity are sinful. Leviticus 18:22; Leviticus 20:13; 1 Corinthians 6:9-10; and 1 Timothy 1:8-11. That they only forbade one form of homoerotic expression, by one of the partners, and only for the Jews, as an expression of ritual separateness.

All of the other passages are talking about other things entirely. You can only try to claim Genesis 19 is not about evil political terrorism including gang-rape if you ignore the parallels to Judges 19 and 1 Chronicles 19.

You can only focus on the fact that the example of sexual addiction in Romans 1:26-27 is same-sex if you ignore the fact that Paul was quoting from two different older documents, one Jewish (Wisdom of Solomon) and one Greek (Plato's Laws), and was trying separately to lull the Jewish readers and the Greek readers into the same "trap" in chapter 2. For the Jews, he was trying to invoke the Leviticus ban, without spelling it out, but for the Greeks, the example came straight out of Laws, where Plato (or rather the character of "the Atheninan") makes it clear that the homoeroticism in the example is mostly meant as a tweak to one of the other characters in the dialogue, a Cretan (On Crete in the time of Plato, they were more "relaxed" about when an eromenos' training was over than in Athens or Sparta, using Ganymede (aka Catamitos) as an example.)

All other passages used to condemn homosexuality condemn either temple prostitution in general as idolatry, or condemn sexual immorality in general and both depend on already assuming that homosexuality is sin.

On the other hand, gays are mentioned twice in the New Testament, and while they are not praised, neither are they condemned for being gay.
 
Upvote 0

Ohioprof

Contributor
Jun 27, 2007
988
219
70
✟28,933.00
Faith
Unitarian
God did not make people gay. Left handed ? Brown eyes ? ... I said a defect. More like being born without arms.
Being gay is NOT like being born without arms. Gay people are completely whole, healthy human beings. We are just different from you in our sexual orientation.

Why do you have so much trouble accepting people who are different from you?
 
Upvote 0

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Interesting, bafriend: I feel the very same way about fundamentalists, regardless of their religion.

I believe that if one is a fundamentalist, there is little (if any) possible way that one deal with social or political issues objectively -- hence, I won't vote for a fundamentalist of any stripe.
 
Upvote 0

UnitedInChrist

Veteran
Mar 23, 2007
365
59
New Jersey
✟16,499.00
Faith
United Ch. of Christ
Marital Status
Single
Barfriend...we know u like to stir the pot. You have been posting anti gay rhetoric for months, and you continue to get no where with your constant bashing of people different than you, and then making it into something biblical. It seems to me, based on ur rants, that you look to the bible as your basis for sexuality. How sad that is.

As for your analogy above..its futile to argue any point with you. You talk about "gene pool" etc..but seem to always leave out the heterosexuals that are unable to conceive. What would be the point of a woman to have her period if she can't have a child? Why would God give man testicles if he were sterile? Not everyone is made to produce, and for that matter...more homosexuals than ever before are having kids. Sexuality has nothing to do with whom can conceive or who wants children. That is just the result of a sexual act. Many homosexuals WANT children...many heterosexuals DO NOT. It just is what it is..so no need to aruge the point further.
 
Reactions: naotmaa
Upvote 0

BAFRIEND

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2007
15,847
1,173
✟23,362.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private

You kind of lost me here ? Why would I bring up straight issues regarding certain conditions regarding sterility excetera on a homosexual debate forum. There is enouph of that in regular CP&E. There is nothing in this thread about children or conceiving. Seems off topic, like you have something else on your mind.

There is a difference between a man and wife in a sacramental marriage than between an adulterous straight or gay couple that makes your point on sterility mute. Does that help you understand why that is non-issue that I do not address ?

You seem to be comparing people who cannot conceive because they are sterile (a medical/physical disorder) with homosexuals, get the irony ?
 
Upvote 0

UberLutheran

Well-Known Member
Feb 2, 2004
10,708
1,677
✟20,440.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
There is a difference between a man and wife in a sacramental marriage than between an adulterous straight or gay couple that makes your point on sterility mute. Does that help you understand why that is non-issue that I do not address ?

Protestants (excluding some Anglicans) do not believe that marriage is a sacrament.

In your view then, are Protestant marriages invalid? What about Jewish or Muslim marriages? Agnostic or atheistic marriages?
 
Upvote 0

BAFRIEND

Well-Known Member
Feb 16, 2007
15,847
1,173
✟23,362.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Protestants (excluding some Anglicans) do not believe that marriage is a sacrament.

In your view then, are Protestant marriages invalid? What about Jewish or Muslim marriages? Agnostic or atheistic marriages?
This is the homosexual debate forum. I have no intention of debating theology or denominational issues here.

Why don't you start a thread in the theology forum ?

If I did not believe that a Jewish marriage was sacramental, then what would be the point ? God said the Jews were his people and he does not lie. As far as protestant denominations, they can be valid (IMO) in the same sense my denomination recognizes most evangelical baptisms.

Hope that answers your questions.
 
Upvote 0

OllieFranz

Senior Member
Jul 2, 2007
5,328
351
✟31,048.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private

Ah, but you were the one who first used the phrase "sacramental marriage." I suspect that UberLutheran thought that you were using the phrase to give some kind of definition of "sacramental" marriage that excludes same-sex marriage, so his question is on topic for a homosexuality debate forum. He was attempting to pin you down on what made a "sacramental" marriage different from any other marriage.

Uber was attempting to point out that using the word "sacramental" would seem to exlude legal marriages between non-Christians and even members of many Protestant denominations. If you are willing to accept those marriages as legitimate, then the distinction of "sacramental" cannot be used to claim that same-sex marriages are not legitimate.

It's time to fish or cut bait. We are waiting for you to clarify what you meant be a "sacramental marriage" and why you referred to one.
 
Upvote 0