Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sorry but thats your poit agaisn and not what I was saying. David waa attracted to the naked woman, how is that homosexual? I thought homosexuals were attrected to the same sex.because no homosexual has ever been married with children *cough* Freddie Mercury*cough cough*
bisexual then?Dear EnemyPartyII
Sorry but thats your poit agaisn and not what I was saying. David waa attracted to the naked woman, how is that homosexual? I thought homosexuals were attrected to the same sex.
Only if it was made by a pro-gay thinker, if it was made by a ChristianI don't know whether it was sexual or not, but I do know that if the exact same story were made into a film in a modern setting without reference to the Biblical characters, it would recieve at least an "R" rating, if not an "NC-17" "for homosexual content."
pro-gay thinkers... or anyone who can see the Bleeding obvious... either/orDear olliefranz
Only if it was made by a pro-gay thinker, if it was made by a Christian
the only sexual content would be David and the women, there wouldn’t be any sexual content between David and Jonathan as their relationship was united in spirit and love.
The only reading between the lines is where pro-gay thinkers are looking for sexual content where it says love. To do so would also require looking at the disciples loving Jesus.
Well if you think bisexual why did you say homosexual? If you are making this upas yuou go along just so you can try and prove what you want to hear then I suggest you stand back and think a bt.bisexual then?
Thats an assumption based on a false assumption. David and jonathan werent in a homosexual relationship, and even if they had been it woudn't have monomgamous as David had wives.A bisexual can be engaged in a strictly monogomous homosexual relationship... just as David and Jonathon were
David didn't have wives while Jonathon was alive though, did he?Dear EnemyPartyII
Well if you think bisexual why did you say homosexual? If you are making this upas yuou go along just so you can try and prove what you want to hear then I suggest you stand back and think a bt.
But it says David was attracted to the women and slept with them, where does it say he slept with jonathan? Until you can show that I cnat accept your assumption
Thats an assumption based on a false assumption. David and jonathan werent in a homosexual relationship, and even if they had been it woudn't have monomgamous as David had wives.
Gay and lesbain thinking seems outside of reality.
Dear olliefranz
Only if it was made by a pro-gay thinker, if it was made by a Christian
the only sexual content would be David and the women, there wouldn’t be any sexual content between David and Jonathan as their relationship was united in spirit and love.
Fun "experiment" describe two "friends" to a self righteous Christian homophobe, describe in full detail their relationship, their feelings for each other, and their parent's disaproval of them. Ask them what they think. Once they wipe the froth from their rage quivering lip, tell them the friends are Jonathon and David.
sure, it takes some effort, and isn't easy to pull off, but I've done it three times, and the look on the face is priceless.
The only reading between the lines is where pro-gay thinkers are looking for sexual content where it says love. To do so would also require looking at the disciples loving Jesus.
Well it is obvious that David thought a naked woman was beautiful, slept with her, and mariried her, but his relationship with jonathan was a bond in spirit and love.pro-gay thinkers... or anyone who can see the Bleeding obvious... either/or
then why did they hide it, why was their love for each other greater than that of any woman, and why was Saul so miffed by it?Dear EnemyPartyII
Well it is obvious that David thought a naked woman was beautiful, slept with her, and mariried her, but his relationship with jonathan was a bond in spirit and love.
So? A one night stand is monogamous while it lasts.David didn't have wives while Jonathon was alive though, did he?
This is a valid point, and yes nakedness `ervah is used in Lev 18, so I take this seriously. But I would point out that just as in Genesis 19 we can see yada is used as sexual as in Genesis 4, yet mostly it is just to know and not carnally. So we have to see which meaning is correct. If you take its usage as in Exodus 21:26 or Genesis 42:12. ..its shame and not sexual.Did you not read the passages I quoted? Uncovering a relative's nakedness is repeatedly used in Leviticus to refer to bringing shame on that relative through your sexual "lifestyle."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?