Nearly 40 years after the Ten Commandments had been given at Sinai, and Israel were about to enter into Canaan, the account of their Exodus was repeated to the new generation. It was said that the Ten Commandments were spoken by God, written by Him on stone, and delivered to Moses. In connection with this, Moses then makes the statement that, “He added no more”. (Deut 5:22)
He added no more. The Ten Commandments formed a complete, distinct, law in themselves. (They were a “whole law”.) There was never anything else added to them. But it seems interesting to me that this cannot be said about the book of ordinances containing the ceremonial laws. There were additions made to that. The ceremonial laws were always only temporary, and subject to modification. A brief example of this is given in the following account.
In the second year after Israel had come out of Egypt, God instituted a Second Passover, because “certain men” found that they were not able to keep the Passover in the first month. (See Numbers 9.) This ‘additional’ Passover was instituted in the second month, and far from it being an isolated, singular event, God established it for their “posterity”, i.e. for the generations that would follow. (Num 9:10). Here we have an example of the ceremonial laws being subject to addition or modification. But this cannot be said of the Ten Commandments.
Many have tried to apply the fourth Commandment to Sunday keeping, thinking that it is entirely in order to modify or change its application. The Commandment specifies the seventh day, but many have thought to change the application to fit the first day of the week.
He added no more. The Ten Commandments formed a complete, distinct, law in themselves. (They were a “whole law”.) There was never anything else added to them. But it seems interesting to me that this cannot be said about the book of ordinances containing the ceremonial laws. There were additions made to that. The ceremonial laws were always only temporary, and subject to modification. A brief example of this is given in the following account.
In the second year after Israel had come out of Egypt, God instituted a Second Passover, because “certain men” found that they were not able to keep the Passover in the first month. (See Numbers 9.) This ‘additional’ Passover was instituted in the second month, and far from it being an isolated, singular event, God established it for their “posterity”, i.e. for the generations that would follow. (Num 9:10). Here we have an example of the ceremonial laws being subject to addition or modification. But this cannot be said of the Ten Commandments.
Many have tried to apply the fourth Commandment to Sunday keeping, thinking that it is entirely in order to modify or change its application. The Commandment specifies the seventh day, but many have thought to change the application to fit the first day of the week.
Last edited: