• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Have you ever played that game?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ainesis

Leaning on Him
May 28, 2004
2,758
104
Visit site
✟3,464.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I agree completely Ufonium2. That is why I said that a lack of Scriptural evidence does not necessarily mean something is wrong. I am not one who believes "Unless it is in the Bible, it is wrong." My concerns about this particular topic is not that it is not specifically mentioned in the Scriptures, but that it seems to contradict the Scriptures (from my perspective). So, I am trying to find the Truth. If my understanding of Scripture is wrong, then I will have to change it. But I will not do that on a whim, so I am seeking to study the subject further.

I understand that perspective and I by no means meant to offend those who believe this tradition to be correct.

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0

linden branch

Active Member
Jun 30, 2004
66
11
49
Dallas
Visit site
✟22,736.00
Faith
Anglican
Perhaps you could spell out how you believe iconography to be a violation of Scripture? I could make some educated guesses, but they could be wrong and then I would have wasted your time.

As an interesting aside, Calvin in his institutes doesn't offer any actual arguments against iconography per se, but rather directs his objections to the abuses of images that he considered to be occuring in his day. On the subject of permissibility, he is largely silent (well, not exactly, he would probably be negatively biased against them, with the understanding that these things would naturally lead to the abuses he found objectionable, but this isn't the same as objecting to icons on a principle basis).
 
Upvote 0

Oblio

Creed or Chaos
Jun 24, 2003
22,324
865
66
Georgia - USA
Visit site
✟27,610.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
There were many errors being practiced in the early church, even as illustrated in Scripture.

I think it is reasonable to expect that if the veneration of icons and the request for intercessory prayer of the reposed Saints were in error, that we would see corrective epistles to affirm this. We do not see verses that list common Orthopraxis as anathema along with other things that were being spoken against in the early Church.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.