Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Evidence can be interpreted --- and interpreted incorrectly.Do we have to have been there for us to have evidence of it having happened?
Wasn't important enough...didn't cause a world-wide catastrophe like science would have you to believe.
Maybe that is where the moon was stuck to the earth....lol. Look at that, I need to write a science book.
So you think a six mile diameter space rock striking the earth and setting off a 100,000,000 megaton explosion was not catasrophic? The ash from this impact has been found geologically (by those science people) worldwide. We have evidence that this is in large part responsible for the mass extinction of dinosaurs. Or do you believe that dinosaurs still exist?Wasn't important enough...didn't cause a world-wide catastrophe like science would have you to believe.
Maybe that is where the moon was stuck to the earth....lol. Look at that, I need to write a science book.
I wasn't defining immovable. I was stating that Psalms 93:1 does not use this word, which was what the argument was being based on.
This verse does not say the earth does not move.
Chicxulub crater is ten miles in diameter (if you don't understand the term diameter, you can wiki it), and the space rock estimated to be about six miles in diameter.hmmm, I wonder what is the curvature of the crater compared to the curvature of the moon? Yall science guys, how close is it? ..and don't steal my "theory"...I am gonna be rich.
Chicxulub crater is ten miles in diameter (if you don't understand the term diameter, you can wiki it), and the space rock estimated to be about six miles in diameter.
I suspect you'll never make one red cent in any area of science. Creationism/ID on the other hand...
Chicxulub crater is ten miles in diameter (if you don't understand the term diameter, you can wiki it), and the space rock estimated to be about six miles in diameter.
I suspect you'll never make one red cent in any area of science. Creationism/ID on the other hand...
Why did they not walk with man after the flood? I thought Noah took two of each?I have been educated...thanks. Luckily, I have a meteor blocking umbrella in my closet right beside my monkey-man finder and ozone hole looker...so I am good.
And there were dinosaurs. They walked with man before the Flood. Why were they not mentioned in the Bible? Again, not really all that important.
I have been educated...thanks. Luckily, I have an meteor blocking umbrella in my closet right beside my monkey-man finder and ozone hole looker...so I am good.
And there were dinosaurs. They walked with man before the Flood. Why were they not mentioned in the Bible? Again, not really all that important.
Yeah, I agree, AV is so much better at that.If you ACTUALLY believe that people and dinosaurs lived the same time, I hardly know what to say, other than, if you didnt like someone to be condescending, dont make it so easy!
And, really, style wise, your snarky sarcasm is a poor poor substitute for either humour or argument.
Yes, thank you.
I've seen this said so many times, but rarely (never?) have I seen a person who said that and actually understood evolution and the evidence behind it. Can you surprise me?Evolution is more fiction than science so maybe it is the "sci" that should be dropped.
That paragraph hurt.He could have just said later in the Pentatuech something like, "Ye thou shouldst worketh only six days, and on the seventh shall ye rest, because thou willdst be tired from working the previous six. Thou also willdst needeth to resteth at night from working hard all day as welleth..."
If you ACTUALLY believe that people and dinosaurs lived the same time, I hardly know what to say, other than, if you didnt like someone to be condescending, dont make it so easy!
And, really, style wise, your snarky sarcasm is a poor poor substitute for either humour or argument.
This seems to be a very common misconception. Evolution never says, and never has said, that any animal should turn into something else. In fact, if we ever did see an animal suddenly become another type of animal, it would be evidence for something else entirely: creation. A turtle giving birth to a frog would overnight turn evolution inside out and wipe it off the table; looking for that kind of thing in order to prove evolution is doing it backwards.My bridge species terminology is meant to reflect the absence of anything becoming something else. Not as in caterpillar to butterfly, but as in a turtle turning into a frog or fish into a snake; let alone from monkey, fish or bird into man.
Evolution will never be proven and neither will Creationism.
This is a Creationist/ID lie. ToE is proven. You need to accept the fact that creationists/IDists will lie and distort the truth. They are famous being deceptive, misrepresenting facts and quote mining to bolster their argument. They have never, ever, done anything remotely close to real science. Their fountainheads are run by diploma mill, hydrologist, lawyer mathemetician types, who would understand ToE if it bit them in their proverbial backside.
In fact, Phillip Johnson's movement "The Wedge" has as their objective, "to convince people that Darwinism is inherently atheistic, thus shifting the debate from creationism vs. evolution to the existence of God vs. the non-existence of God. From there people are introduced to the 'the truth' fo the Bible and then 'the question of sin' and finally 'introduced to Jesus.'" -Church and State Magazine, 1999.
Name just one time where science went back and rewrote the "fundamentals."We will just have to agree to disagree. None of that proves anything more than one person/group of people's opinion. Science constantly goes back and rewrites the fundamentals. In fact, if evolution was proven as you say then there would only be Creationist who disagreed, but that isn't the only two theories. Why haven't these other "worldly" groups jumped on board with Evolution with all this indisputable proof and left only us weirdos?
The Bible is constant, science is not.
You didn't answer my questions and I'll assume it was by mistake. So, I'll repost my questions:Evidence can be interpreted --- and interpreted incorrectly.
If you want us to abandon our faith in the Scriptures --- you'd better be convincing --- or no deal.
From dictionary.com:Not that I know of --- not according to Psalm 93:1.
Do you really believe that science is just making up stuff?We will just have to agree to disagree. None of that proves anything more than one person/group of people's opinion. Science constantly goes back and rewrites the fundamentals. In fact, if evolution was proven as you say then there would only be Creationist who disagreed, but that isn't the only two theories. Why haven't these other "worldly" groups jumped on board with Evolution with all this indisputable proof and left only us weirdos?
The Bible is constant, science is not.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?