Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Hate on Trial
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CaDan" data-source="post: 67115891" data-attributes="member: 24881"><p>Ruling on motion to dismiss in August of '13 <a href="http://ccrjustice.org/files/SMUG_OrderDenyingDefMTD_08_13.pdf" target="_blank">here.</a> (PDF)</p><p></p><p>Pertinent part:</p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px">Based on these authorities it is clear that the Amended Complaint sets forth sufficient allegations to support a claim for activity outside the protection of the First Amendment. Plaintiff contends that <strong>Defendant&#8217;s conduct has gone far beyond mere expression into the realm</strong> not only of advocacy <strong>of</strong> imminent criminal conduct, in this case advocacy of a crime against humanity, but <strong>management of actual crimes -- repression of free expression through intimidation, false arrests, assaults, and criminalization of peaceful activity and even the status of being gay or lesbian -- that no jury could find to enjoy the protection of the First Amendment.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CaDan, post: 67115891, member: 24881"] Ruling on motion to dismiss in August of '13 [url=http://ccrjustice.org/files/SMUG_OrderDenyingDefMTD_08_13.pdf]here.[/url] (PDF) Pertinent part: [indent]Based on these authorities it is clear that the Amended Complaint sets forth sufficient allegations to support a claim for activity outside the protection of the First Amendment. Plaintiff contends that [b]Defendant’s conduct has gone far beyond mere expression into the realm[/b] not only of advocacy [b]of[/b] imminent criminal conduct, in this case advocacy of a crime against humanity, but [b]management of actual crimes -- repression of free expression through intimidation, false arrests, assaults, and criminalization of peaceful activity and even the status of being gay or lesbian -- that no jury could find to enjoy the protection of the First Amendment.[/b][/indent] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Hate on Trial
Top
Bottom