Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
A poster looks forward to Bill Gates entering the thread as this seems to becoming the thread of “boogeymen of the right-wing” coming to get your children!
"Clinton first met Alinsky when she was at Wellesley working on her 1969 thesis on his controversial theories on community organizing, many of which were outlined in his 1946 handbook, "Reveille for Radicals."
In the book, Alinsky encouraged community organizers to "fan the latent hostilities" of low-income, inner city residents and "search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them." His 1971 book, "Rules for Radicals," published a year before his death, expanded on that theme. "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it," Alinsky wrote.
“Dear Saul,” Clinton wrote in the 1971 letter. "When is that new book [Rules for Radicals] coming out — or has it come and I somehow missed the fulfillment of Revelation? I have just had my one-thousandth conversation about Reveille and need some new material to throw at people."
She thanked Alinsky for the advice he gave her about campus organizing.
“If I never thanked you for the encouraging words of last spring in the midst of the Yale-Cambodia madness, I do so now,” Clinton wrote.
According to Clinton's 2004 memoir, "Living History," Alinsky had offered her a job after her graduation from Wellesley, but she turned him down.
Yep. Hillary was a BIG fan of Alinsky and did her senior thesis on his book. Read Hillary Clinton's 1971 letter to Saul Alinsky
Whatever that is supposed to mean.... In reality, I added facts with sourced links about Hillary Clinton and her interests since someone mentioned it.A poster looks forward to Bill Gates entering the thread as this seems to becoming the thread of “boogeymen of the right-wing” coming to get your children!
There isn’t a clan of The Left, (you know), all colluding together to bring about the downfall of America, eager to bathe in the ashes of our once mighty Nation, but only factions and shared-interests vying with one another and scheming their plots to get a wee bit closer to the immortality that forever ebbs away from them.Whatever that is supposed to mean.... In reality, I added facts with sourced links about Hillary Clinton and her interests since someone mentioned it.
He a hero for letting people lie and cause hate on Twitters."Elon Musk is a hero for free speech", we all know what was going on at Twitter before Musk, it was operation Stop Trump and conservatives through censorship
Now the world has Truth Social and X, and Elon Musk emptied the trash can at Twitter
Sounds like CNN, MSNBC, and the New York TimesHe a hero for letting people lie and cause hate on Twitters.
You said on post 63: "A poster looks forward to Bill Gates entering the thread as this seems to becoming the thread of “boogeymen of the right-wing” coming to get your children!"There isn’t a clan of The Left, (you know), all colluding together to bring about the downfall of America, eager to bathe in the ashes of our once mighty Nation, but only factions and shared-interests vying with one another and scheming their plots to get a wee bit closer to the immortality that forever ebbs away from them.
The whole thread is just about how some of the wealthy people on the left are spending their (own) money “wrong”, by promoting Harris.You said on post 63: "A poster looks forward to Bill Gates entering the thread as this seems to becoming the thread of “boogeymen of the right-wing” coming to get your children!"
That makes zero sense.
This post you just added also makes zero sense. Just say what you are saying without all the odd language.
Ok. Now it makes sense.The whole thread is just about how some of the wealthy people on the left are spending their (own) money “wrong”, by promoting Harris.
George Soros has long been active in placing his money at the disposal of people/organizations that he agrees with; (and I am sure we can safely assume that he withhold his money from people/organizations that he’s not in agreement with).
All of this is part of a normally functioning body politic.
Yes, even the complaints that he’s funding “the wrong people/things” is part of this normality.
But it is the Right that is more organized and better able to march in lockstep simply because the Right tends to be reactionary (rather than being proactive).
yeah thats a load of nonsense, he censors, just anyone that talks bad about stuff he actually likes. the guy is a complete hypocrit."Elon Musk is a hero for free speech", we all know what was going on at Twitter before Musk, it was operation Stop Trump and conservatives through censorship
Now the world has Truth Social and X, and Elon Musk emptied the trash can at Twitter
He does not censor for political views. If someone threatens someone, launches personal attacks or doxxes or something like that, maybe so.yeah thats a load of nonsense, he censors, just anyone that talks bad about stuff he actually likes. the guy is a complete hypocrit.
Again, only when it targets him, when it's the far right doing it, he has no problem with it, he's a hypocrit, only cares about removing free speach when it suits him. Not to mention potential shadow bans and such the guys a liar and you all fell for it, kinda sad.He does not censor for political views. If someone threatens someone, launches personal attacks or doxxes or something like that, maybe so.
So something like 65 years ago?"Clinton first met Alinsky when she was at Wellesley working on her 1969 thesis on his controversial theories on community organizing, many of which were outlined in his 1946 handbook, "Reveille for Radicals."
It's so strange that the people most familiar with Alinsky who have most taken him to heart and mind are the Magadonians.In the book, Alinsky encouraged community organizers to "fan the latent hostilities" of low-income, inner city residents and "search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them." His 1971 book, "Rules for Radicals," published a year before his death, expanded on that theme. "Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it," Alinsky wrote.
“Dear Saul,” Clinton wrote in the 1971 letter. "When is that new book [Rules for Radicals] coming out — or has it come and I somehow missed the fulfillment of Revelation? I have just had my one-thousandth conversation about Reveille and need some new material to throw at people."
She thanked Alinsky for the advice he gave her about campus organizing.
“If I never thanked you for the encouraging words of last spring in the midst of the Yale-Cambodia madness, I do so now,” Clinton wrote.
According to Clinton's 2004 memoir, "Living History," Alinsky had offered her a job after her graduation from Wellesley, but she turned him down.
Yep. Hillary was a BIG fan of Alinsky and did her senior thesis on his book. Read Hillary Clinton's 1971 letter to Saul Alinsky
Nice to see you've recognized that leaders in your party were closely aligned with "Saul Alinsky's" teachingsSo something like 65 years ago?
It's so strange that the people most familiar with Alinsky who have most taken him to heart and mind are the Magadonians.
Since us lefties are constantly derided as "radical left" we should start reading Alinsky and following his rules.
Nonresponsive to my statement: "Obama wanted Hillary Clinton for president again, they have the same schooling credentials in Chicago, (Saul Alinsky "Rules For Radicals"")So something like 65 years ago?
It's so strange that the people most familiar with Alinsky who have most taken him to heart and mind are the Magadonians.
Since us lefties are constantly derided as "radical left" we should start reading Alinsky and following his rules.
What a weird complaint as I wasn't even attempting to respond to that statement; I was responding to that which I quoted.Nonresponsive to my statement: "Obama wanted Hillary Clinton for president again, they have the same schooling credentials in Chicago, (Saul Alinsky "Rules For Radicals"")
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?