Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Hannity Defends Vigilante Killer
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Vylo" data-source="post: 65524499" data-attributes="member: 10362"><p>No he wouldn't be free. There is this thing called basic forensics, which would show that a girl shot twice already was executed by a shot under the chin. That isn't self defense, nor defense of property. That's murder. The fact that he lured them, planned it out, and then executed them makes in premeditated murder.</p><p></p><p>I'm sure where you get "2 future felons that knew no boundaries". These kids were thieves, not cannibal-puppy burning-incestual-child molester-murderers. You wouldn't want them in your neighborhood for sure, but you mast well adjusted people wouldn't want to stalk them like predators and relish in murdering them either. They would want them punished and set straight. It always seems like when I hear people make these kinds of "these kids are scum" comments, they seem to get amnesia about all the illegal things they and their friends did in their teenage years.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Vylo, post: 65524499, member: 10362"] No he wouldn't be free. There is this thing called basic forensics, which would show that a girl shot twice already was executed by a shot under the chin. That isn't self defense, nor defense of property. That's murder. The fact that he lured them, planned it out, and then executed them makes in premeditated murder. I'm sure where you get "2 future felons that knew no boundaries". These kids were thieves, not cannibal-puppy burning-incestual-child molester-murderers. You wouldn't want them in your neighborhood for sure, but you mast well adjusted people wouldn't want to stalk them like predators and relish in murdering them either. They would want them punished and set straight. It always seems like when I hear people make these kinds of "these kids are scum" comments, they seem to get amnesia about all the illegal things they and their friends did in their teenage years. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Hannity Defends Vigilante Killer
Top
Bottom