Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Green new deal NOT about climate? Chakrabarti indicates about economy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="carlv_52" data-source="post: 74115668" data-attributes="member: 420395"><p>Not really. I mean I've worked around a lot of scientists for a long time, a lot of earth scientists, and I don't hear many who are skeptics. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>There aren't really 'extreme' measures. </p><p></p><p>But I note that you didn't address the point I made: the disagreements are usually quite technical in nature. So if YOU want to side with a smaller group of experts over a larger group of experts, exactly what reasoning do you have TECHNICALLY to do so?</p><p></p><p>The example I gave of the Mann Hockey Stick and the McKitrick and McIntyre critique is a good one. How do YOU do your principal component analyses? You see, in order to come down on M&M's side against the hockey stick...<strong>you have to understand principal component analysis and that treatment of the data.</strong> </p><p></p><p>Personally I don't understand PCA sufficiently to go with the view that doesn't comport with what the vast majority of experts think.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="carlv_52, post: 74115668, member: 420395"] Not really. I mean I've worked around a lot of scientists for a long time, a lot of earth scientists, and I don't hear many who are skeptics. There aren't really 'extreme' measures. But I note that you didn't address the point I made: the disagreements are usually quite technical in nature. So if YOU want to side with a smaller group of experts over a larger group of experts, exactly what reasoning do you have TECHNICALLY to do so? The example I gave of the Mann Hockey Stick and the McKitrick and McIntyre critique is a good one. How do YOU do your principal component analyses? You see, in order to come down on M&M's side against the hockey stick...[B]you have to understand principal component analysis and that treatment of the data.[/B] Personally I don't understand PCA sufficiently to go with the view that doesn't comport with what the vast majority of experts think. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Politics
American Politics
Green new deal NOT about climate? Chakrabarti indicates about economy
Top
Bottom