Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Graham declares ‘war’ against NY to protect Chick-fil-A’s Sundays off
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SimplyMe" data-source="post: 77502507" data-attributes="member: 9588"><p>Sure, but all businesses have items in a contract that they find non-negotiable. All this law is defining is something the state believes is non-negotiable. And the reason for this is to ensure that restaurants are open in rest areas on the busiest travel days. It doesn't make any sense to negotiate with restaurants and allow them to close when demand is the highest. That is all NY is attempting to do with this law. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sorry, the idea of "higher the cost of execution and less flexible" is not necessarily true, and is definitely true in this case. Of all the "major" fast food restaurants, Chick-Fil-A is the only one that I can think of that demands (or even requests) to close on a particularly day. In fact, with Chick-Fil-A demanding to close on some of the busiest travel days (since that is a non-negotiable item for them), it can be argued that it is actually costing money -- as they are closed on some days when the demand is the highest. Additionally, it is not being open on some of these busiest days that causes a loss of tangible benefits to customers -- the opposite of your claim.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SimplyMe, post: 77502507, member: 9588"] Sure, but all businesses have items in a contract that they find non-negotiable. All this law is defining is something the state believes is non-negotiable. And the reason for this is to ensure that restaurants are open in rest areas on the busiest travel days. It doesn't make any sense to negotiate with restaurants and allow them to close when demand is the highest. That is all NY is attempting to do with this law. Sorry, the idea of "higher the cost of execution and less flexible" is not necessarily true, and is definitely true in this case. Of all the "major" fast food restaurants, Chick-Fil-A is the only one that I can think of that demands (or even requests) to close on a particularly day. In fact, with Chick-Fil-A demanding to close on some of the busiest travel days (since that is a non-negotiable item for them), it can be argued that it is actually costing money -- as they are closed on some days when the demand is the highest. Additionally, it is not being open on some of these busiest days that causes a loss of tangible benefits to customers -- the opposite of your claim. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
Graham declares ‘war’ against NY to protect Chick-fil-A’s Sundays off
Top
Bottom