• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

dallasapple

Well-Known Member
Aug 13, 2006
9,845
1,169
✟13,920.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married


This is so true..If you look at full blown addiction as a disease process..that is SEPERATE from marital issues..YOU must then focus on ONLY the addiction when adressing the ADDICTION.

Isnt fair?I agree how is it "unfair" to focus soley on recovering from a horrible prison like existance that is caused by the ADDICTION only not by ones spouse?

If you are for instance being told by your employers..that you are at risk of being terminated for missed days at work..And they realize and are willing to work with you for a known substance abuse problem including giving you leave for treatment..Would you then say ..BUT you promised me a raise that I never got..and that new secretary is not giving me my messages..what about that?Why are we ONLY focussing on my substance abuse issues?Thats not "fair" !
 
Reactions: mkgal1
Upvote 0

Conservativation

Well-Known Member
Jun 18, 2009
11,163
416
✟13,552.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married


This is why Im asking...does all this apply to things other than addiction.

I think its a reasonable and important question.

Folks agree about addiction. What about other things?
 
Upvote 0

Conservativation

Well-Known Member
Jun 18, 2009
11,163
416
✟13,552.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Id agree
But I was hoping for a broad consensus because the OP drifted into the addiction discussion and it was the example by which some standards seemed to be arrived at, so to what would those apply. A spouse who is ignoring the other....well some call that abuse, some dont, its not important and I do not wish to debate that....what I do want to know is though, would you recommend this same set of unilateral focused approach there, or wouldnt it be better to see and talk to both sides, since it is a RELATIONAL issue, which involves by definition 2 people, and therefore both sides MUST be considered.

I was hoping to see what others think, and Im not trying to argue about my specific example, it was just an example
 
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,338
7,348
California
✟573,733.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Here is a little bit of Pastor John Baker's testimony...he is one of the pastors at Saddleback Church as leader of recovery and small groups.

 
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,338
7,348
California
✟573,733.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The way I see Pastor Baker's testimony is...that it isn't the acting out on the addiction that is the root sin....it is that he valued himself as an individual over the marriage unit (as an entity that included he and his wife). He was willing to have his wife and family walk away from him, but he wasn't going to allow his wife and family get between him and his drinking.

He protected his alchohol....not his family. THAT is the core issue...and that was most likely evident earlier on, before it had become a full-blown addiction...most likely back before he even met his wife...when he first discovered alchohol in college. That he was using the alchohol to mask and deal with things. To medicate himself through life. His alchohol became an idol...and he was willing to trade everything for it...."just don't touch the alchohol...you can take everything else."
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,338
7,348
California
✟573,733.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The "Positive" Hospital Parable

Imagine a doctor in a clean, well lit hospital having the following dialog with a patient: "What seems to be the problem?" The patient replies, "My fingers are great." "Good, but what is wrong with you." "Well, my feet are really feeling fantastic." "Fine, but this is a hospital, what can we do for you?" "Well, let me brag about my legs, I have been walking on them all day!" "Great, but this is a place of healing. Around here, we focus on what is wrong so that we can make you fully healthy. Now then, where does it hurt." Now imagine the patient saying: "That isn't very positive, I would rather talk about what is right about me" or "I think I'll find a new hospital. I feel so "sick" here, everyone seems to be so judgmental and faultfinding."

Or, on the contrary, imagine a more needy patient going into a hospital and begging for help for a particular problem, and having the doctor say, "Don't condemn yourself by admitting you have a problem. I don't receive that, brother! Let's focus on the positive. Besides, we were having a cheerful conversation about how great the hospital administrator is... " The church should function as a spiritual hospital. A place for sinners to come and be healed. But more often, in modern Christianity, churches have become places where people are affirmed in their sickness, or worse still where sick people brag about self-wellness.
 
Upvote 0
R

Romanseight2005

Guest


This is so true! It seems that the word grace has come to mean, in many churches, that God is happy with our sins. Or that what they need to be freed from isn't their sin, but rather, any and all, expectations. In fact, if you believe that God has any expectations of you,(not for the purpose of getting saved, but rather an expectation of showing the work done in you) Than you are a legalist. That definition has also changed.
 
Upvote 0

Conservativation

Well-Known Member
Jun 18, 2009
11,163
416
✟13,552.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Yes few churches have the nerve to, for example, hold anyone accountable for an unBiblical divorce, or to even call it sin. When in fact they should be shining the light of sin truth brightly into the eyes of those filing divorces for reasons that are truly not Biblical....not the extrapolations of whats Biblical...but whats REALLY Biblical.

Unless and until they do that one, they would have no credibility on the others anyway.

It would all be good...if only.
 
Upvote 0
Apr 15, 2009
6,988
385
Canada
✟31,558.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
It seems like it depends on the sin, whether or not Christians worry about grace and conviction and all that.

Freedom from sin is really only one thing--relying upon God. So I wonder how the OP ties in with for example Jesus' treatment of the woman taken in adultery. This seems to be a typical way in which Jesus handles sin, if you can call anything Jesus did typical. He makes it very clear to the men who have taken the woman to punish her that they themselves are not sinless. And when he says "go and sin no more" it is often simplistically taken to be that she ought not to commit adultery again. But it seems to me that Jesus' approach is never piecemeal like that. It is always about encouraging that deep relationship with God that makes sin unecessary because we realize what a good Father in Heaven we really have.

The hard thing is when you are in an intimate relationship with someone it is really really difficult to deal with this. Sins that a person may be caught up in affect us personally and so it's hard not to want to simply fix the problem. In fact it's almost impossible. But all things are possible with God. What I'm trying to point out is that while we may point out the truth it may not be up to us to make sure that another person receives it at that moment. That may require us to make decisions that are uncomfortable or difficult or painful. Like for example having a drug addict around your kids is probably a bad idea. But you see that's a practical thing. The guy who had Legion inside him had chains around him (which didn't work) until Jesus sent the demons away. So maybe in the face of constant sin we need to be pursuing God's wisdom in how to deal with it.
 
Upvote 0
R

Romanseight2005

Guest
But Mcscribe the problem is that you seem to be saying that restoring a person is somehow the same as punishing them. Furthermore, let's look at what the pharisees were doing to the woman. They were not punishing her. What they were literally doing was murdering her in a vicious way, I might add. What Jesus did was to restore her. This is what the OP is advocating. Restoration, which entails cleansing. He didn't say, go on and keep on doing what you are doing, it's all good. He told her to go and sin no more. We certainly don't hear that preached. Somehow the idea of restoring, is now looked at as punishing. I think that is the whole premise of this thread.
 
Reactions: mkgal1
Upvote 0

Conservativation

Well-Known Member
Jun 18, 2009
11,163
416
✟13,552.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Good that you agree. Restoration isnt something we can do, its Jesus who does it.

Thats a great thing to have realized. If the premise had anything to do with people restoring people, its flawed. We can onlky offer grace and/or truth (the premise) not restoration
 
Upvote 0
Apr 15, 2009
6,988
385
Canada
✟31,558.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Romans, I'm not literally saying that going to a Christian counselor is like being stoned to death. What I'm saying is two things: first that Jesus says very clearly that we should be careful to examine the beam in our own eye first. He is also very clear when he says that then we can pluck the beam from our neighbor's eye. Second, I'm saying that it is too tempting to focus on the particular sin of the woman taken in adultery when Jesus came to free us from our SINS--every one of them. So he doesn't say 'don't sleep around anymore' he says 'don't SIN anymore'.

Besides, I thought that was something you and MK agreed with, that it's not our particular sins that are the problem but our relationship with God that has to become better.
 
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,338
7,348
California
✟573,733.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
And that is what the article was asking for...or pointing out...that truth needs to be offered.
 
Upvote 0
R

Romanseight2005

Guest

Yes, I agree with everything you posted here. It sounded like you were saying in your other post, that what this thread was suggesting, was punishment of sin. Also, people commonly look at the wife caught in adultery with a figurative lens. That is why I felt the need to point out the literalness of that passage.
 
Upvote 0
R

Romanseight2005

Guest
Gal 6:1-5

Brethren, if a man is overtaken in any trespass, you who are spiritual restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness, considering yourself lest you also be tempted. 2 Bear one another's burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ. 3 For if anyone thinks himself to be something, when he is nothing, he deceives himself. 4 But let each one examine his own work, and then he will have rejoicing in himself alone, and not in another. 5 For each one shall bear his own load.
NKJV
 
Upvote 0

Conservativation

Well-Known Member
Jun 18, 2009
11,163
416
✟13,552.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Most of the time, divorce is a SYMPTOM of other sin....not the actual root sin.

Sin destroys...and a marriage dissolving is the destruction.


If I steal because Im hungry, is stealing a sin, or a symptom

No, the divorce Im talking about is sin. Sin is sin is sin, not to bog down in divorce here. There are not mitigating circumstances making one sin less because its a symptom or whatever rationale.
Divorce without Biblical cause is sin, its as simple as that and it shouldnt be hard to say or accept. Until they do, the rest is window dressing as a witness.
 
Upvote 0

Conservativation

Well-Known Member
Jun 18, 2009
11,163
416
✟13,552.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married


Different restore...hopefully you realize that. That we can pull the same word out doesnt mean the same thing

OR, are you saying we can do as Jesus did?

I wont argue this....its just not the case. Maybe some folks think they can....but they cant. Leave Godly restoration to God.

Whats referred to in the passage here is what could be called "getting him back on his feet"....not a spiritual restoration.
 
Upvote 0