• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Good Intentions

revolutio

Apatheist Extraordinaire
Aug 3, 2003
5,910
144
R'lyeh
Visit site
✟6,762.00
Faith
Atheist
Here is an essay I wrote for a class in school quite a while back. I wrote this late at night and was surprised in the morning to see how much of my usually surpressed pessimism showed through.

Reading over it I thought it was decent work and not entirely untrue so I decided to post it here and see what you guys think. On the topic I mean, not my writing abilities.
Humanity is not some uncaring monster that is bent on destroying the world. Humanity is an unthinking monster that is destroying the world. At the head of some of the most damaging programs, industries, and efforts there are people with genuinely good intentions. Their obliviousness easily could be considered criminal negligence.

One of the most pressing issues on most people's minds is that of world hunger. Every second humans die of starvation all over the world. In response to this there are hundreds of programs set up to feed the hungry and get food to less fortunate countries. Unfortunately it is their good intentions that assure there will be even more suffering and mouths to feed in the future. A basic law of nature states that an increase in food supply yields an increase in population. Because people cannot bear to see any people dieing now, they are in turn creating an even bigger problem in the future.

Humans want to have purpose. No one wants to wake up in the morning without a reason to go on. In our quest for purpose we have found the the closest thing to this is improvement. We are consistently looking for ways to improve every aspect of our lives. We build and create at a rate rivaling ants and with ingenuity and originality far beyond. Our factories churn out petty trinkets as fast as they can: scented soaps, stylish pants, music CDs, breath mints, flavoured water, toy cars, and anything else might 'improve' someone's life. These same factories, in their quest to contribute to mankind, pour thousands of tons of noxious gas into our atmosphere. This gas eats away at the ozone layer that protects us from the harmful ranged of solar radiation gradually allowing more and more of it through. Another factory opens and begins churning out sunscreen.

Meanwhile humanity expands its boundaries all over the Earth displacing millions of animals from the homes where they have resided for generation after generation. However these creatures do not go unnoticed, some recognize their plight and take it upon themselves to preserve some of them in the hopes of getting them to breed and be reintroduced into a new habitat (which will subsequently be destroyed at some later date). These animals are put into zoos where people pay money to stare and gawk at them. Meanwhile the animals suffer. In captivity animals begin adopting strange and repetitive habits such as passing, excessive grooming, and even agressiveness. Almost all would be classified as depressed compared to their wild brethren though some don't know this, having never seen their original home.

With a little luck, future generations will discard the concept that good intentions alone are needed to effect beneficial change. Humanity might even be able to be satisfied with its domain and cease expansion in favour of true improvements to society and possibly the environments it destroyed in its expansion. Only time will tell.
 

Sophia23

Snotty Applefanny
Jan 4, 2004
380
14
39
Wales
Visit site
✟592.00
Faith
Other Religion
Although I do think good intentions are at the root of a lot of evil done, feeding the poor isn't one of those. There is more than enough food for everyone on earth - just that most of it sits around not being eaten in the west because no-one can afford to buy it. Even if there wasn't quite enough there - we in the west eat far more than we need, it makes us unhealthy - we can afford to share it around a lot.

I know its not the cause of all the worlds problems - but money is a very serious issue. An awful lot of evil is done in the name of profit, and profit is made in the name of good - a lot of those in big buisness feel when it comes to money - the ends justify the means.

If we feed the poor and educate them about the perils of overpopulation - it can and *is* having a profound effect, slowly our attempts to stabalise the world population ARE having an effect, and not by letting people die, by stopping them having huge families. Of course death rates (especially from AIDS) are contributing to this, but thats not a good thing imho, death hurts more than the dying - the death of ones parent or ones children can and does drive people insane from misery.

Technology does currently have a damaging effect on the enviromen - but there is hope, we ARE developing enviromentally safe alternatives, again slowly, again there is much damage already done - but there is hope, and it is that striving for good that gives us hope - it allows us to see what we have done, and do our best to fix it. Sure we will invariably create new problems - but those problems can be overcome. If one loses hope in progress, what is the alternative. I know someone who decided to go live on a commune dedicated to the simple life, problem was they refused to accept modern medicine because they (correctly) assumed it was the cause of much unethical practice (animal testing, human testing in some cases in some places up to more recently than you'd think, enviromently unsafe practices/pacaging etc) - the commune fell apart when people started dying, they didn't know how to cope.

We can progress technologically without damaging the world. I have a belief in that. And I don't think we can stop progress without becoming other than human, curiosity and a desire for comfort alone cause progress, let alone other motivations.

Change is inevitable, the question is one of forethought. Aswel as clearing up ones own mess.

Hmmm...
 
Upvote 0

Sophia23

Snotty Applefanny
Jan 4, 2004
380
14
39
Wales
Visit site
✟592.00
Faith
Other Religion
back to the money thing - one thing that struck me a long while ago is a lot of the really over the top bad stuff that happens - allowing people like bill gates to have billions of dollars while some people live on less than a $1 (I am not sure in what time frame we learned it in school)... allowing 20% of the people to have more than 80% of the worlds resorces...

...its wanting to have stuff, when you are never even going to use it. I know I am guilty of this, but think about it - Bill Gates doesn't even spend most of that money, he just keeps it in stocks and shares and banks and stuff, and half the stuff he does buy (speculating here) he probably never uses.

On a more personal level, I have stuff I don't even rember I have, hidden under my bed and the like - and its not even like I will use that stuff some day because I don't rember it. Why have stuff that your not going to use, I have nothing against having comforts, but having things for the sake of having them...

thats just... mean. Everything you own deprives someone else of it or the resorces that make it up. Perhaps we (I mean I here ;) ) should consider that when we buy and when we earn.
Maybe I should clean out my clutter and give it to the charity shop...

wow man - you did a good deed today!!! :D You made me think ...but more than that - plan to act... and by next week you may have made me act and had a knock on diffrence in the world... doesn't that just make you feel all WOW! :clap:
 
Upvote 0

revolutio

Apatheist Extraordinaire
Aug 3, 2003
5,910
144
R'lyeh
Visit site
✟6,762.00
Faith
Atheist
Sophia23 said:
Although I do think good intentions are at the root of a lot of evil done, feeding the poor isn't one of those. There is more than enough food for everyone on earth - just that most of it sits around not being eaten in the west because no-one can afford to buy it. Even if there wasn't quite enough there - we in the west eat far more than we need, it makes us unhealthy - we can afford to share it around a lot.
I am aware of this. However the problem is not entirely just where the food is now, it is where it is being produced. Though countries or areas should have no need to be autonomous in food production in today's world they should certainly be able to get by without starving. Though we may be able to afford spreading around the food we have produced now, we cannot afford to continually ship food to impoverished areas.
This is not the solution though. The solution is to find a way to get those areas a stable and consistent food source so that there will be no need for a redistribution of food to those areas. However there seems to be more money going into immediately feeding those people than finding a way to keep it from ever happening again.

If you are intered in this sort of thing I highly recommend you read Daniel Quinn's Ishmael. It is one of the most thought provoking books I have ever read.

Sophia23 said:
back to the money thing - one thing that struck me a long while ago is a lot of the really over the top bad stuff that happens - allowing people like bill gates to have billions of dollars while some people live on less than a $1 (I am not sure in what time frame we learned it in school)... allowing 20% of the people to have more than 80% of the worlds resorces...
Actually the ratio is closer to 10% controlling 90% of the wealth. Kind of sad. Alot of people who are in that ten percent don't even realize it, especially in first world nations.

On a more personal level, I have stuff I don't even rember I have, hidden under my bed and the like - and its not even like I will use that stuff some day because I don't rember it. Why have stuff that your not going to use, I have nothing against having comforts, but having things for the sake of having them...

thats just... mean. Everything you own deprives someone else of it or the resorces that make it up. Perhaps we (I mean I here ;) ) should consider that when we buy and when we earn.
Maybe I should clean out my clutter and give it to the charity shop...
It would be a good deed.
My family does recycle however we don't donate to charity nearly as often as I feel we should. My excessive apathy and laziness tends to keep me from getting much done. Though I am working to get over this.

wow man - you did a good deed today!!! :D You made me think ...but more than that - plan to act... and by next week you may have made me act and had a knock on diffrence in the world... doesn't that just make you feel all WOW! :clap:
:eek: :blush:
 
Upvote 0

burrow_owl

Senior Contributor
Aug 17, 2003
8,561
381
48
Visit site
✟33,226.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
doesn't sound to me like you're questioning the moral validity of good intentions (or rather the status of good intentions as moral yardstick) so much as you're questioning the sincerity of those intentions and the sensitivity of moral agents to other moral projects.

in other words, you're saying: yeah, people have good intentions, but in their rush to act on those intentions, they act rashly and without sufficient foresight. This is always - always- a good thing to keep in mind and to try to remember, but the moral status of good intentions is kinda peripheral to the actual target of your essay.
 
Upvote 0

revolutio

Apatheist Extraordinaire
Aug 3, 2003
5,910
144
R'lyeh
Visit site
✟6,762.00
Faith
Atheist
burrow_owl said:
in other words, you're saying: yeah, people have good intentions, but in their rush to act on those intentions, they act rashly and without sufficient foresight. This is always - always- a good thing to keep in mind and to try to remember, but the moral status of good intentions is kinda peripheral to the actual target of your essay.
True, I used good intentions as more a unifying factor and catch phrase for the essay rather than as the subject matter.

A message is 40% presentation, 10% content, and 50% BS afterall. :)
 
Upvote 0