Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I would like to discuss how ANYONE thinks that they have the right or authority to change God's Law.
Im not really going anywhere with this, i would like to start a discussion about this, as i know not everyone knows this.well that's hanging it out there.
Would youcare to expound a little bit so we can have some idea of where you're going with this?
Which shows exactly what i am saying, the Roman Catholic Church decided to re-write God's 10 Commandments.I am not sure what point you're driving at but the entire set of commandments can be found inside the Catechism:
http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/command.htm
The entire passage from Exodus is included. The entire passage from Deuteronomy is right next to it. Then a distillation of them is included right next to that.
YHWH's Lion said: ↑
I would like to discuss how ANYONE thinks that they have the right or authority to change God's Law.
well that's hanging it out there.
Would you care to expound a little bit so we can have some idea of where you're going with this?
They did not such thing. They included the entire passages from Exodus and Deuteronomy in the Catechism. What you're objecting to is their numbering; the substance is the same.Which shows exactly what i am saying, the Roman Catholic Church decided to re-write God's 10 Commandments.
What are you talking about, they got rid of the 2nd " You shall not make for yourself a graven image" they changed the 4th"Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy." to "Remember to keep holy the LORD'S Day" and they split the 10th into 2.They did not such thing. They included the entire passages from Exodus and Deuteronomy in the Catechism. What you're objecting to is their numbering; the substance is the same.
I would like to discuss how ANYONE thinks that they have the right or authority to change God's Law.
They haven't "changed" anything. Those passages are all found in Catholic editions of Bibles. However, they created a numbering system for the Catechism that you don't approve of. That's the real problem you seem to have.What are you talking about, they got rid of the 2nd " You shall not make for yourself a graven image" they changed the 4th"Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy." to "Remember to keep holy the LORD'S Day" and they split the 10th into 2.
It's the Church's Bible. The Church can do what it likes with it. ;-)I would like to discuss how ANYONE thinks that they have the right or authority to change God's Law.
They haven't "changed" anything. Those passages are all found in Catholic editions of Bibles. However, they created a numbering system for the Catechism that you don't approve of. That's the real problem you seem to have.
In truth, the change took place after the Lutheran and Anglican reformations. Lutherans and Anglicans retain the traditional numbering. The change in numbering and emphasis seems to have come about at the hands of the reformed protestants some time later and has been used to support the iconoclastic positions of these other Churches. Since Lutherans and traditional Anglicans are not iconoclasts, why change something that has been accepted by those way smarter than I over many centuries.
Likewise with the Peasants Revolt in Germany and the influence of Karlstadt. Luther was criticized for his support for the military intervention by the Princes; but without such there might have been just as wide a destruction of altars, organs, stained glass, icons, statues and tombs as their was in England. Such great treasures and objects of inspiration; lost, and the desecration of the remains of saints.There was alas a major outbreak of iconoclasm in England; there was some iconoclasm even under Cranmer, in the form of altar-smashing and relic-smashing, for example.
Likewise with the Peasants Revolt in Germany and the influence of Karlstadt. Luther was criticized for his support for the military intervention by the Princes; but without such there might have been just as wide a destruction of altars, organs, stained glass, icons, statues and tombs as their was in England. Such great treasures and objects of inspiration; lost, and the desecration of the remains of saints.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?