Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Is that why it took years to expose Nebraska Man? the superiority to eye-witness accounts?
Superior observation.
(Or do they somehow escape scientists' 20/10 vision?)
Not a good example.
"Expose" from WHAT?
Nobody ever really bought that he was a real ancestor!
ONE GUY made a mis-identification of a tooth, pretty much the entire scientific community rejected the identification as unsupported!
And YES, thank's for making my point!
Because you know WHAT eventually turned it from "not supported to be of a human" to "DEFENETLY NOT a human"? Evidence!
NOT eye witness accounts!
Because the forensic evidence was SUPERIOR, and didn't require any eye-witnesses!
You've perfectly made my point. Thanks!
Is that why it took years to expose Nebraska Man? the superiority to eye-witness accounts?
Nobody ever really bought that he was a real ancestor!
Good ... then let's go with Haeckel's embryos.
How is it these scientists with their supervision missed them?
Good ... then let's go with Haeckel's embryos.
How is it these scientists with their supervision missed them?
LOL -- solid aurum.Shapeshifting dinosaurs?
I don't believe in such nonsense! Nobody does!
Right ... and nobody ever really bought that Thalidomide was a prenatal wonder drug, did they?
We "common people" are just "nobodies" compared to scientists and their supervision, aren't we?
Why do you feel the need to spread misinformation?
Good ... then let's go with Haeckel's embryos.
How is it these scientists with their supervision missed them?
Uh-huh.They didn't.
So much for 20/10 vision then, eh?No, they did. And it was a tragedy.
And we can actually show that this was an actually held believe, in contrary to your story that Nebraska-man was ever excepted by the scientific community!
No, I completly disagree with you on that.
I don't think that scientists are infaluable.
I just think that people who aren't scientists usually get their information about "science" from very unreliable sources, and then end up believing nonsense (like: "Nebraska man fooled the scientific community").
So much for 20/10 vision then, eh?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?