Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just to be clear here, we're talking about only naturalistic mechanisms creating humanity, right?
Problem is, evolution doesn't go into anything in regards to philosophy or theology on way or the other, and it is evidenced based, regardless as to whether or not you like it.
Evolution is just an explanation of observation. If we ever observe god in some definite way, they'll be theories abound in regards to details about its existence, etc. We observe that populations change over time, and we observe certain mechanisms that facilitate the change. Evolutionary theory explains this observation in a concise way.
It seems clear that you consider any scientific that doesn't mention God as atheistic. As viewpoints go, this is a little (cough, cough) one might say--strange?.
Since you know so terribly little about either science or evolution, your comment doesn't carry much weight.
Dizredux
Problem is, evolution doesn't go into anything in regards to philosophy or theology on way or the other, and it is evidenced based, regardless as to whether or not you like it.
Let me ask again, we're talking about only naturalistic mechanisms creating humanity?
Only because that is all we can see really. In a definitive way, but non naturalistic influences are not denied nor suggested.
But you cannot see only naturalistic mechanisms creating anything remotely as complex as the human machine.
But you cannot see only naturalistic mechanisms creating anything remotely as complex as the human machine.
Let me ask again, we're talking about only naturalistic mechanisms creating humanity?
Magic?What other kinds of "mechanisms" are there?
By that definition, Atheistic Darwinist creationism is not a scientific theory. Therefore it is not taught in schools as science.
It seems clear that you consider any scientific that doesn't mention God as atheistic. As viewpoints go, this is a little (cough, cough) one might say--strange?.
It is your story and you are going to stick to it no matter what the evidence.
Since you know so terribly little about either science or evolution, your comment doesn't carry much weight.
Dizredux
Point out where any impetus, other than only naturalistic mechanisms, is allowed, permitted or discussed in our schools. Yes, the atheistic Darwinist creationist view is the only view allowed in our schools for the creation of all life from an alleged single life form.
Things that belong in science class: science.
Things that do not belong in science class: superstitions.
JustSince you know so terribly little about either science or evolution, your comment doesn't carry much weight.
Your response does not relate to my statement in the least. Reading comprehension again?I'm sure in your mind yours does. Keep promoting the Godless view of humanity's existence and you'll have the Godless to support your delusions.
And this is why the baseless view of a form of creationism which teaches all life forms are the result of only random, mindless, meaningless, purposeless and goalless is not science and shouldn't be taught in schools.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?