Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I am sorry, but so much was incorrect in that statement that I didn't view correcting monkeys to apes as important enough to delay the post.
Speciation is explained within the theory of evolution. However, to be clear, the origin of life itself is not, and I despise ever so much that I have to state that so often.
Obviously, the monkeys coming from birds is a joke to show how ridiculous it is that another animal is turning into a different animal....given millions of years.
It is also intended to show that eventually...the evolutionist is stuck with saying organic matter came from inorganic matter and eventually everything came from nothing.
Fair enough. I'm sure there will always be new members here posting things along those lines.
Looks like the evolution definition is a soup du jour term. It's changing on a weekly basis. See one of Kent Hovind's debates where he does a thorough job exposing it.
Looks like the evolution definition is a soup du jour term. It's changing on a weekly basis. See one of Kent Hovind's debates where he does a thorough job exposing it.
Oh, but it is a whole lot more and you know it. Species changing characteristics and adapting to environment changes isn't really evolution.
It's speciation within species populations.
Obviously, the monkeys coming from birds is a joke to show how ridiculous it is that another animal is turning into a different animal....given millions of years.
It is also intended to show that eventually...the evolutionist is stuck with saying organic matter came from inorganic matter and eventually everything came from nothing.
Looks like the evolution definition is a soup du jour term. It's changing on a weekly basis. See one of Kent Hovind's debates where he does a thorough job exposing it.
Looks like the evolution definition is a soup du jour term. It's changing on a weekly basis. See one of Kent Hovind's debates where he does a thorough job exposing it.
Where? Name that species.
Kent Hovind?
Dr. Dino?
The moron, who thinks that clouds can stop x-rays, who doesn't know the difference between a gene, a genome, chromosomes and base-pairs?
The moron who believes that there used to be a water-dome over the entire earth?
And who can't tell the difference between a rotting basking-shark corps and a dinosaur corps?
That scientificly illiterate moron?
Please don't tell me that this guy isn't still used as a reference by people
You would have a stroke if you knew just how often he is used as a reference. From the stress
Yeah, but...
Even other big-name creationists distance themselves from him and his bat-[bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] ideas!
...
*sigh*
This is the kind of things that sometimes makes me really, really sad
Gotta love the censor on this site
Ensatina salamander, for example.
Or Larus gulls.
These are examples of so called ring-species, very interessting phenomenon which shows speciation better than any other example.
But especially in plants it's a fairly common occurence.
Here you can find a list:
Observed Instances of Speciation
Have fun.
The Wiki, on evolution, states that species just appeared suddenly in the Cambrian explosion.
What kind of time-span do you think is meant by "suddenly" here?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?