Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
'God the Son' is unbiblical
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tellyontellyon" data-source="post: 77429795" data-attributes="member: 425478"><p>Thank you for replying and good use of logic. I have stated and restated throughout the thread that I'm not saying that Jesus isn't God, or that 'God the Son' would be theologically inaccurate...</p><p>What I am saying is that it would have been very easy and clear for God (through the Scriptures) to have used this phrase God the Son... but he didn't.</p><p>I don't think God didn't use the phrase because it would have been inaccurate.. As I said, this is not a critique of the Trinity... but it does seem unusual to me that the phrase wasn't used, when it IS such a precise and useful term to use.</p><p>I don't think God does things by accident, so I don't think it's an accident that the phrases Son of Man and Son of God are used instead.</p><p>Son of Man suggests that Jesus is indeed God and Messiah, But Son of God emphasise Sonship...</p><p>Some replies have explained this... but it still seems significant to me that God's incarnation came as a Son.</p><p>Thinking on it, I think it has a particularly emotional impact that a Son died for our sins.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tellyontellyon, post: 77429795, member: 425478"] Thank you for replying and good use of logic. I have stated and restated throughout the thread that I'm not saying that Jesus isn't God, or that 'God the Son' would be theologically inaccurate... What I am saying is that it would have been very easy and clear for God (through the Scriptures) to have used this phrase God the Son... but he didn't. I don't think God didn't use the phrase because it would have been inaccurate.. As I said, this is not a critique of the Trinity... but it does seem unusual to me that the phrase wasn't used, when it IS such a precise and useful term to use. I don't think God does things by accident, so I don't think it's an accident that the phrases Son of Man and Son of God are used instead. Son of Man suggests that Jesus is indeed God and Messiah, But Son of God emphasise Sonship... Some replies have explained this... but it still seems significant to me that God's incarnation came as a Son. Thinking on it, I think it has a particularly emotional impact that a Son died for our sins. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Outreach
Outreach
Exploring Christianity
'God the Son' is unbiblical
Top
Bottom