Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Scott_LaFrance said:There are Christians and there are Gnostics, one cannot be both.
hiumble1 said:Is it not corrinthians (or galatians, can't remember) where it says do not set before your eyes anything wicked or evil?....
Just knowing enough from my 'presaved days' they are new agy in thought... you become enlightened and ascend to a higher plain, etc....
A. believer said:Ummm, I think she's referring to Gnosticism as a Christian-based heresy as opposed to pagan Gnosticism not based on anything Christian. I'm pretty sure we all agree here that one cannot be a "Christian Gnostic."
CoolWater said:"One cannot be a Christian and be Gnostic."
Are you serious??? What a prideful, shallow, and fear-encompassed comment. Who are you to say this? And its my guess that you, like many here, have not read the gnostic texts with an open mind. If you go into anything thinking that it is going to be filled with darkness, evil, deceit, and malice, surely, that is all you will see.
First of all, Christ's words have always been crypic-- whether they are included in the canon or elsewhere. We have 2000 years of dogma, of human designation and interpretation, to apply to the words of Christ that are in the New Testament. It is because of these 2000 years **ONLY** that we all have any sembalence of a religion. But the truth of the matter is that Christ spoke in parables, riddles, and descriptives that in many times are ambiguous at best. Try and remove your blinders when reading his words in the NT and you, too, will find that His concepts (that we all find so simplistic now thanks to those 2000 years) are very deep, crypic statements. Only a Master, one with total knowledge of the Creator, the Great Spirit, could possibly say the things in the Book. And likewise, how can we, mere simpletons, even hope to understand the smallest iota of Christ's teachings. It is impossible. All we can hope for are simplifications... which is what the church as done in the past 2000 years to His words.
Secondly, how can you, or anyone in this thread, remove the politics out of the formation of the Canon? And, really, why does it matter? Do you really think that those people who were on the canon had any real direct link to God? Do you think they had X-ray vision wherein they could determine what was "God-Breathed" and what wasn't? Give me a break. Back in the fifth century, there was MUCH more competition going on for incluence than there is now in 2006. Today, the Catholics and Protestants are still fighting over insignificant details (use this forum for proof). Do you think there was any difference then??? When the stakes where higher? When there was major disagreements to the interpretations of Christ's cryptic words that he had spoken 400 years prior? Politics, whether in nations or within institutions has existed since the beginning of time. Surely, it plays a huge role whever the majority wants to do away with the minority... which is exactly what happened when the established Christian church wanted to get rid of any differing opinion. And lets face it, 2000 has not really changed anything, as currently we Christians still want to remove anything that WE (not necessarily God) disagree with.
And lastly, I just might add that the Gnostic Gospels might just be the most valuable, richest treasure trove that Western Civilization (at least) has. Why? For simply this reason: Because humanity has not assigned their interpretation to Christs words-- yet. If you pick up any of the Gnostic Gospels, you will find Christ's words unadulterated, unfiltered, pristine, and without humanity's influence. Right now whenever you open your Bible, you have everyone else's opinion screaming in your ear whenever you read any passage. How can you separate what is real with what is blatant interpretation? You can't.
But the beauty with the Gnostic Gospels is that they have only been discovered for ~50 yrs (the Nag Hammadi at least). No dogma has yet to be assigned to them. If you have enough patience, you can read the words the others have recorded of Christ, and make up your mind, FOR YOURSELF, of what Christ was saying. And maybe, just maybe, they will agree, concur, harmonize, jive with not only your existing beliefs, but with the beliefs off All- Buddhist, Hindu, Muslim, Toaist, etc. After all, how could Christ's message not be applicable to all?
CoolWater said:as currently we Christians still want to remove anything that WE (not necessarily God) disagree with.
CoolWater said:After all, how could Christ's message not be applicable to all?
What is this condescending gibberish supposed to mean? Why don't you say what you want to say without the theological jargon?A. believer said:All this, and still, you confess Nicaean Trinintarian orthodoxy? Hmmm.
Dragons87 said:My...what truth. There are so many chunks I want to take out from the Bible! All that stuff about genocides, slavery, you-can't-love-both-the-world-and-God-at-the-same-time doctrine...
And then we'll play right into the hands of the atheists and the gnostics, and most importantly, the Devil. The reason why the Bible is so detestable to so many people is exactly because bits of it is detestable. We dare not change the Word of God without His guidance, so let it be detestable! If God's Word was easy to swallow, I'd be quite worried at the quality of God!!
It is already applicable to all without the gnostic texts. You can find Christians in all countries, all cultures.
CoolWater said:OK, first of all, I wasn't referring to removing parts of the Bible. I was making reference as to how us Christians like to try and convert ANYONE, regardess of how pious, devout, or Godly they might be under their own religion.
Its funny, I was thinking about this reply and I came to this: Ultimately, differing religions are akin to different languages. Do you think God differentiates between prayers spoken in English to prayers spoken in Russian, Punjabi, or Manderin? Of course not, something simple like that is no problem for Something as might as our God. Conversely, do you think God really differentiates between different earthly cultures? Because, really when you boil everything down, different religions are soley based on two things: God and the indiginous culture. Meaning, the genesis of all religions is first, God. Second, the culture. So in the same respect as language, do you really think that God cares AT ALL about the cultural part? Throw out your dogma and think about that.
CoolWater said:What is this condescending gibberish supposed to mean? Why don't you say what you want to say without the theological jargon?
It means that if you don't accept 100% of the precepts presended in in Nicene Creed, you are not a Christian by definition as determined by the rules of this Forum. In case you didn't know, the Council of Nicea established that creed specifically to refute the Gnostic borne heresy of Arius. I repeat, you cannot be both Christian and Gnostic. You are either saved by grace through faith in Christ, or you are saved by secret knowledge. Jesus commanded his Apostles NOT to keep knowledge of Him a secret. He said, "Go forth and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit and teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you, ..."CoolWater said:What is this condescending gibberish supposed to mean? Why don't you say what you want to say without the theological jargon?
ah, but just because the Council beleived that one could not both beleive in the Creed and beleive in Gnosis, does not mean that modern or then Gnostics agree.Scott_LaFrance said:It means that if you don't accept 100% of the precepts presended in in Nicene Creed, you are not a Christian by definition as determined by the rules of this Forum. In case you didn't know, the Council of Nicea established that creed specifically to refute the Gnostic borne heresy of Arius. I repeat, you cannot be both Christian and Gnostic. You are either saved by grace through faith in Christ, or you are saved by secret knowledge. Jesus commanded his Apostles NOT to keep knowledge of Him a secret. He said, "Go forth and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit and teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you, ..."
Understood, but by definition, if one believes in salvation through secret knowledge they are not Christian. Christ did not come to give us secret knowledge, He came to die on our behalf and repair the bridge to God.tsukino_Rei said:ah, but just because the Council beleived that one could not both beleive in the Creed and beleive in Gnosis, does not mean that modern or then Gnostics agree.
Gnosis - intuitive knowledge of spiritual truths;Scott_LaFrance said:Understood, but by definition, if one believes in salvation through secret knowledge they are not Christian. Christ did not come to give us secret knowledge, He came to die on our behalf and repair the bridge to God.
Sorry about that. Where was I... oh ya. There was no single school of thought among Gnostics. Salvation through secret knowledge was not a beleif that was common throughout Gnosticism. Deepening Relationship through Spiritual Revelation was the commonality. Not unlike Wesleyan Holiness Doctrine, Sanctification Doctrine, and sects of modern Christianity who like to reference Paul in Hebrews. (you know the spot - bread and milk, then Melchizadek).tsukino_Rei said:Gnosis - intuitive knowledge of spiritual truths;
-of relating to or posessing intellectual or spiritual knowledge.
-Intuitive apprehension of spiritual truths, an esoteric form of knowledge sought by the Gnostics.
www.wordreference.com
www.thefreedictionary.com
Esoteric
Oh, and by the way, you really don't think "secret knowledge" exists??? You think that EVERYTHING there is to know is printed among the pages in the Bible? Even it Hebrews (among other places), it alludes to the fact that there is something more thank what we think we know:Scott_LaFrance said:It means that if you don't accept 100% of the precepts presended in in Nicene Creed, you are not a Christian by definition as determined by the rules of this Forum. In case you didn't know, the Council of Nicea established that creed specifically to refute the Gnostic borne heresy of Arius. I repeat, you cannot be both Christian and Gnostic. You are either saved by grace through faith in Christ, or you are saved by secret knowledge. Jesus commanded his Apostles NOT to keep knowledge of Him a secret. He said, "Go forth and make disciples of all nations, baptising them in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit and teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you, ..."
Because I am an orthodox Christian as defined in the Nicene Creed, not a Deist, Free-Thinker, or Open Theist who choose to recreate God in their own image.CoolWater said:Oh, and by the way, you really don't think "secret knowledge" exists??? You think that EVERYTHING there is to know is printed among the pages in the Bible? Even it Hebrew, it alludes to the fact that there is something more thank what we think we know:
13Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about righteousness.
Again, when talking about things like "salvation" and "secret knowledge" you must remove your dogma, your preconceptions. Why can't these things co-exist? Because you read about it somewhere? Because that's what tradition has always said? Because that's what your pastor or your theology professor told you? Remove your self from these things that shackle your mind. FIND OUT FOR YOURSELF THE MEANING OF CHRIST!!!
I was thinking about this, this morning: Sure, if we want to blindly accept all Christian teachings, if we want to mindlessly listen to the pastor every Sunday, if we do the things that we are supposed to do within our Christian religion, we will find God. That the beauty of it.
However, God gave us a mind for a reason. He has given us the ability to seek out inconsitancies, to search out "hidden knowledge" (because lets face it, its there... it MUST be there. To suggest otherwise would be to trivialize God-- certainly he does not tell us anything, therefore there is some knowledge that is hidden). God wants us to rationalize those things that religioin doesn't clarify. Jacob wrestled the angel, and the angel was overcome. Do you think that this really refers to an actual wrestling match?
Seek and you will find-- this has become a cliche. However, if you are tired of the Sunday School stories that you have been told since you are little... if these things have been told and retold so many times that they have lost their meaning, SEEK FOR MORE AND GOD WILL REVEAL TO YOU SECRETS!!!! It can't be anymore simple.
Thats the shame in it... you have done exactly what you say you have not done. By blindly accepting what is given to you without putting thought into it, you have recreated God in the image of others.Scott_LaFrance said:Because I am an orthodox Christian as defined in the Nicene Creed, not a Deist, Free-Thinker, or Open Theist who choose to recreate God in their own image.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?