• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

GMO foods cause smaller testicles and brains

Feb 27, 2015
144
14
✟354.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Married
"Everything you wanted to know about GMO's but were afraid to ask"

This article packs so much information about GMO "foods" that it deserves its own thread.

sott.net/article/277281-Everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-GMOs-but-were-afraid-to-ask

Here's an excerpt:

<b>Pusztai had been commissioned to study GMO foods. However, his shocking findings were not welcomed by giant agribusinesses that foresaw mega-fortunes in cornering the market on GMO crops through patents, nor by the politicians to stood to profit from the success of such monopolistic tactics. Pusztai's findings documented that:

&#65279;
Rats fed GM potatoes had smaller livers, hearts, testicles and brains, damaged immune systems, and showed structural changes in their white blood cells making them more vulnerable to infection and disease compared to other rats fed non-GMO potatoes.

It got worse. Thymus and spleen damage showed up; enlarged tissues, including the pancreas and intestines; and there were cases of liver atrophy as well as significant proliferation of stomach and intestines cells that could be a sign of greater future risk of cancer. Equally alarming, results showed up after 10 days of testing, and they persisted after 110 days that's the human equivalent of 10 years.&#65279;​
Pusztai was fired shortly after publishing his findings.

In May of 2009, the American Academy of Environmental Medicine (AAEM) urged doctors to instruct their patients to avoid GMO foods and called for a moratorium on GMO foods. According to AAEM's position paper, authored by Amy Dean, D.O. and Jennifer Armstrong, M.D., "Several animal studies indicate serious health risks associated with GM food." These risks include accelerated aging, infertility, insulin regulation, immune problems, and changes in the gastrointestinal system and in the major organs. "There is more than a casual association between GM foods and adverse health effects. There is causation," wrote Dean and Armstrong.

Numerous studies, including Pusztai's, have documented changes in the pancreas, spleen, and livers in multiple animal studies. Mice fed GM corn, including Monsanto's immensely prevalent Bt corn, expressed infertility and lower birth weights. Additionally, over 400 different genes in the GM corn fed to the mice were altered, many of these genes having to do with, according to genetic researchers Aysun Kilic and M. Turan Akay, the "control [of] protein synthesis and modification, cell signaling, cholesterol synthesis, and insulin regulation."

A 2008 study by Alberto Finamore revealed "...intestinal damage in animals fed GM foods, including proliferative cell growth," and a concurrent study by M. Malatesta discovered a "disruption of the intestinal immune system" in mice. According to top French toxicologist G. E. Seralini, Monsanto's own study showed evidence of poisoning in the major organs of rats fed Bt corn.

The first published human study by Trudy Netherwood and colleagues in 2004 revealed that the genes inserted into GM soybeans and used in soy products transfer into the DNA of human intestinal bacteria (the "good bacteria" that allows us to eliminate toxins properly and promote a healthy immune system), and it remains continuously active. In other words, the GMOs we ingest today become part of our genetic makeup, turning our beneficial intestinal bacteria into veritable pesticide factories, possibly for life. The paper concludes: "...because of the mounting data, it is biologically plausible for Genetically Modified Foods to cause adverse health effects in humans... GM foods pose a serious health risk in the areas of toxicology, allergy and immune function, reproductive health, and metabolic, physiologic, and genetic health..."

With such compelling revelations surfacing, public pressure has been mounting on the U.S. federal government to follow the EU's lead in mandatory labeling of all GMO food products.
</b>
 

Senator Cheese

Master of Cheese
Feb 4, 2014
812
96
✟23,914.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
GMO_Dawkins.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Feb 27, 2015
144
14
✟354.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Married
"No GMO's in our food supply please"

Really? Still trying to push the lie that GMO produces more food than organic?

Again, see here: rodaleinstitute.org/assets/FSTbooklet.pdf

And here's an excerpt:

Organic yields match conventional yields.

Organic outperforms conventional in years of drought.

Organic farming systems build rather than deplete soil organic matter, making it a more sustainable system.

Organic farming uses 45% less energy and is more efficient.

Conventional systems produce 40% more greenhouse gases.

Organic farming systems are more profitable than conventional.
 
Upvote 0
Feb 27, 2015
144
14
✟354.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Married
Sounds like the sort of thing that somebody who's being paid to post would say.

Not sure to what you're referring. If you're referring to the attempted defense of the indefensible - GMO's - then I agree.

If you're referring to the Rodale Institute study then you know nothing of Rodale and should educate yourself.
 
Upvote 0

SepiaAndDust

There's a FISH in the percolator
May 6, 2012
4,380
1,325
58
Mid-America
✟34,046.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Not sure to what you're referring. If you're referring to the attempted defense of the indefensible - GMO's - then I agree.

If you're referring to the Rodale Institute study then you know nothing of Rodale and should educate yourself.

I'm referring to everything you post.
 
Upvote 0

loveofourlord

Newbie
Feb 15, 2014
9,131
5,088
✟325,393.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Is there any evidence for his claims? Something missed by I don't know, billions of tests done every year on GMO's that anything this majour would have been noticed LONG ago, and how would GMO's plural even cause these problems? It's not like every GMO is the same, or could even cause the same issues, this is just pure quackery.
 
Upvote 0
Feb 27, 2015
144
14
✟354.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Married
Is there any evidence for his claims? Something missed by I don't know, billions of tests done every year on GMO's that anything this majour would have been noticed LONG ago, and how would GMO's plural even cause these problems? It's not like every GMO is the same, or could even cause the same issues, this is just pure quackery.

Do yourself a favor and read this:

sott.net/article/277281-Everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-GMOs-but-were-afraid-to-ask
 
Upvote 0

SepiaAndDust

There's a FISH in the percolator
May 6, 2012
4,380
1,325
58
Mid-America
✟34,046.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Ok, now you're just being nasty.

Until you write a substantial post that's something other than a link to or a copy/paste from some other site, then nasty is really the best you can hope for.
 
Upvote 0

loveofourlord

Newbie
Feb 15, 2014
9,131
5,088
✟325,393.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Do yourself a favor and read this:

sott.net/article/277281-Everything-you-wanted-to-know-about-GMOs-but-were-afraid-to-ask

I said evidence, any quack can post these problems, why hasn't a single farmer brought these issues forward from the lost revenues, or problems caused by all the GMO "experiments" they do? You do know that GMO foods have been fed to the animals we kill for food, for dozens of years now, and if there was some massive significant problem caused by GMO's they would have been picked out?

But of course everyone loves the one lone wolf speaking out against the evil's of X, saving the world from evil things. Even though his claims don't even make a single bit of sense. GMO isn't one thing, it's thousands of different products that are changed in different ways, you couldn't get a single one of the things he claimed from GMO as GMO is a catagory not a entity.

Oh...okay I see the single source problem from feeding GMO potatoes to rats :> THEIR RATS, they don't survive on potatoes, it's not generally good for them, it doesn't contain the nutrients and other things they would require for a good health diet. Ahhh and looking into it, raw potatoes are toxic to rats, this looks like a really badly done experiment, reminds me of the rats fed corn having cancer tumours, and he used a breed of rats that naturally have higher rates of tumours.

So yeah, you feed a small number of rats alot of potatoes without other proteins that are needed for a healthy diet and wonder why complications might show up.
 
Upvote 0

bill5

Well-Known Member
Jul 30, 2011
6,091
2,195
✟70,699.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

KitKatMatt

stupid bleeding heart feminist liberal
May 2, 2013
5,818
1,602
✟37,020.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
You might want to get a better source for your information, OP.

SOTT.net is a research project of the non-profit Quantum Future Group (QFG). The project includes collecting, arranging, and analyzing news items that seem to best reflect the dominant 'energies' on the planet. This research further includes noting whether or not human beings, individually and/or collectively, can actually remember from one day to the next the state of the planet, and whether they are able to accurately read that information and make intelligent decisions about their future based on that knowledge. In short, SOTT.net is an experiment.
 
Upvote 0

variant

Happy Cat
Jun 14, 2005
23,790
6,591
✟315,332.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Really? Still trying to push the lie that GMO produces more food than organic?

Again, see here: rodaleinstitute.org/assets/FSTbooklet.pdf

And here's an excerpt:

Organic yields match conventional yields.

Organic outperforms conventional in years of drought.

http://www.cnn.com/2012/04/26/world/organic-food-yield/

More labor intensive.

Also needs better soil and more land.

Organic yield gap shrinking? Study actually shows it&#8217;s less sustainable than conventional ag | Genetic Literacy Project

With best farming practices, conventional farming is better for feeding more people.

What organic farmers are doing right is that they rely on best farming practices more (because they have to) but that has now been the trend in conventional farming as well.
 
Upvote 0
Feb 27, 2015
144
14
✟354.00
Faith
Anabaptist
Marital Status
Married
More labor intensive.

Also needs better soil and more land.



With best farming practices, conventional farming is better for feeding more people.

What organic farmers are doing right is that they rely on best farming practices more (because they have to) but that has now been the trend in conventional farming as well.

The Rodale study covers a thirty year field trial. Your references don't compare even remotely with the depth and breadth of the Rodale thirty year trial and study.

The Rodale study is a thirty year side by side trial. The links you site don't hold a candle to the depth and breadth of the Rodale studies and trials.

Take some time to review it in depth: rodaleinstitute.org/assets/FSTbooklet.pdf
 
Upvote 0

loveofourlord

Newbie
Feb 15, 2014
9,131
5,088
✟325,393.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The Rodale study covers a thirty year field trial. Your references don't compare even remotely with the depth and breadth of the Rodale thirty year trial and study.

The Rodale study is a thirty year side by side trial. The links you site don't hold a candle to the depth and breadth of the Rodale studies and trials.

Take some time to review it in depth: rodaleinstitute.org/assets/FSTbooklet.pdf

Mybe I'm missing something, but the 30 year trial was conventional vs organic, not GMO nescarily specificly vs organic, and in many ways fails to show what it claims because conventional did better in many areas, in amount of nitrogen needed, amount of offtime that is required for certain foods and so on.
 
Upvote 0