Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Global Warming & Earths Global Temperature Measurement
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sculleywr" data-source="post: 67171343" data-attributes="member: 289167"><p>What I did was show the same level of ridiculousness as you have. You want us to accept only the data that disagrees with the hockey stick, despite the fact that the vast majority of the data fits that model. You want us to show evidence that isn't funded by someone who has vested interest contrary to your statements. So I ask for you to provide exactly the same thing as you are asking of me. The problem you're having is hypocritical in nature. You will accept nothing that contradicts your belief, and so it is settled in your mind. </p><p></p><p>The only difference is that I did what you are doing intentionally, while you do it out of ignorance. Even the sources you get your information from are saying that the hockey stick is true. The GCSN, where your graph claims to come from, says that they have never seen that graph before it was published on a random blog. I've posted their original graph, ripped straight out of the journal article. Both the unadjusted and the adjusted figures give a hockey stick. </p><p></p><p></p><p>The fact is that before the adjustments, the temperatures showed a hockey stick. After the adjustments they also showed a hockey stick. So what's the problem?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sculleywr, post: 67171343, member: 289167"] What I did was show the same level of ridiculousness as you have. You want us to accept only the data that disagrees with the hockey stick, despite the fact that the vast majority of the data fits that model. You want us to show evidence that isn't funded by someone who has vested interest contrary to your statements. So I ask for you to provide exactly the same thing as you are asking of me. The problem you're having is hypocritical in nature. You will accept nothing that contradicts your belief, and so it is settled in your mind. The only difference is that I did what you are doing intentionally, while you do it out of ignorance. Even the sources you get your information from are saying that the hockey stick is true. The GCSN, where your graph claims to come from, says that they have never seen that graph before it was published on a random blog. I've posted their original graph, ripped straight out of the journal article. Both the unadjusted and the adjusted figures give a hockey stick. The fact is that before the adjustments, the temperatures showed a hockey stick. After the adjustments they also showed a hockey stick. So what's the problem? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Global Warming & Earths Global Temperature Measurement
Top
Bottom