Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Global Warming & Earths Global Temperature Measurement
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Heissonear" data-source="post: 67049136" data-attributes="member: 298614"><p>The below repost has not been addressed, which summarizes the dilemma to "incomplete and inaccurate numbers about earth's global temperature over time".</p><p></p><p></p><p><strong>Nobody has answered the thread question.</strong> </p><p></p><p>The CAGW Bandwagon group promoting CO2 induced Global Warming have not made clear to others their limitations and inaccuracies when stating and graphing their "Global Earth Temperature" values and charts. </p><p></p><p>Others have tried to detour the issue by presenting "data sets" by weather agencies in graphed form to show "anomalies" - changes in temperature within these data sets over time - but such numbers ploted to the second decimal are from severely incomplete databases of "earth's global temperature" . </p><p></p><p>When we talk about Global Earth Temperature for a period of time it means Global Temperature for a period of time. Not calculations from severely incomplete databases. </p><p></p><p>Some then try to shift weight to the incomplete data sets like the calculated temperatures from them are near equivalent to claim accurate earth temperature change as a whole, accurate enough for the earth's global temperature, even to claim accuracy to within 0.1 °C. Who are they really fooling? It's themselves . </p><p></p><p>Some think too highly of themselves and what they can do and claim before the masses. </p><p></p><p>And others cannot make rational observations of nature and measurement methods themselves and fall prey to the claims of others, even from media and scientific groups.</p><p></p><p>The fundamental evidence of CO2 induced Global Warming is first knowing Global Surface Temperature values, either per day, month, and/or year. But no one has or can give such data. </p><p></p><p>Once again, temperature statements from incomplete data sets are not Global Surface Temperature data, and particularly within 0.1 °C accuracy , much less 0.01 °C accuracy . </p><p></p><p>Incomplete data sets do not capture the Earth's Atmospheric Energy and the Atmospheric Energy Change that occurs over time, nor the one parameter to express that Atmospheric Energy, that being earths surface temperature.</p><p></p><p>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Heissonear, post: 67049136, member: 298614"] The below repost has not been addressed, which summarizes the dilemma to "incomplete and inaccurate numbers about earth's global temperature over time". [B]Nobody has answered the thread question.[/B] The CAGW Bandwagon group promoting CO2 induced Global Warming have not made clear to others their limitations and inaccuracies when stating and graphing their "Global Earth Temperature" values and charts. Others have tried to detour the issue by presenting "data sets" by weather agencies in graphed form to show "anomalies" - changes in temperature within these data sets over time - but such numbers ploted to the second decimal are from severely incomplete databases of "earth's global temperature" . When we talk about Global Earth Temperature for a period of time it means Global Temperature for a period of time. Not calculations from severely incomplete databases. Some then try to shift weight to the incomplete data sets like the calculated temperatures from them are near equivalent to claim accurate earth temperature change as a whole, accurate enough for the earth's global temperature, even to claim accuracy to within 0.1 °C. Who are they really fooling? It's themselves . Some think too highly of themselves and what they can do and claim before the masses. And others cannot make rational observations of nature and measurement methods themselves and fall prey to the claims of others, even from media and scientific groups. The fundamental evidence of CO2 induced Global Warming is first knowing Global Surface Temperature values, either per day, month, and/or year. But no one has or can give such data. Once again, temperature statements from incomplete data sets are not Global Surface Temperature data, and particularly within 0.1 °C accuracy , much less 0.01 °C accuracy . Incomplete data sets do not capture the Earth's Atmospheric Energy and the Atmospheric Energy Change that occurs over time, nor the one parameter to express that Atmospheric Energy, that being earths surface temperature. . [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Global Warming & Earths Global Temperature Measurement
Top
Bottom