Georgia Gov Kemp calls for Signature Audit - Dec 4

[BobRyan]

Georgia Gov Kemp calls for signature audit of mail-in ballots today -
Georgia Governor Calls For 'Signature Audit' After Ballot-Counting Video Presented at Hearing

==========shortly after this came out in Georgia Senate Judiciary hearing =====

Video evidence appears to show large bins of votes coming out from under tables after observers leave the room.

Rudy Giuliani gives video 'evidence' of ballot fraud in Georgia | Daily Mail Online

from that link "There are an estimated 6,000 ballots in each box, which if accurate would amount to about 24,000 potential votes"

at 9:28 min:sec this video gets interesting.

Notice that recent news items point to the fact that ballot/voter fraud is something we have each election cycle - the main question is whether it is enough to change election outcome when it is discovered. Having legal votes negated by a swarm of illegal/invalid ballots/votes is always something to be avoided no matter what political party you favor.

 

[BobRyan]

interesting that what many eye-witnesses have testified to - seems to now come out in video.

Will be interesting to see where this goes.

 

[Jonathan Walkerin]

Will be interesting to see where this goes.

Things people find interesting after they are married.....

 

[miamited]

Hi bob,

And this, according Georgia Pulbic Broadcasting: Fact Checking Rudy Giuliani's Grandiose Georgia Election Fraud Claim

God bless,
ted

 

[Always in His Presence]

Hard to argue with a video. Sounds like a logical next step.

 

[Fantine]

Sheesh! We've been through this already. Votes are private--whether by mail or in person. Signatures do not appear on the ballots themselves--only on the internal envelopes people are required to place their ballots in.

The signatures were double-checked on each envelope, and only those envelopes with valid signatures were opened.

I am so tired of these baseless claims, especially coming from Brian Kemp, whose actions as Secretary of State when he was running against Stacey Abrams for governor were soundly questioned, and were, at the very least, a serious conflict of interest.

I hope that he and others remember that while their tactics may be casting doubts on the legitimacy of Biden's clear, compelling, undeniable win for their own voters, 50% plus 6 million other voters see their tactics as clear, compelling, undeniable proof of their lack of character.

 

[BobRyan]

Sheesh! We've been through this already. Votes are private--whether by mail or in person. Signatures do not appear on the ballots themselves--only on the internal envelopes people are required to place their ballots in.

The signatures were double-checked on each envelope, and only those envelopes with valid signatures were opened.

Mail-in ballots have signature on outer envelope.. apparently. The last time that same person voted - they also had a signature. So there is "such a thing" as signature matching.

Irregularities with mail-in ballots resulted in almost 3% having been found to have some sort of problem in previous elections. It has the largest truck-sized at-risk factor of any vote format that we have.

History does not get deleted simply because it is 2020

 

[Always in His Presence]

Mail-in ballots have signature on outer envelope.. apparently. The last time that same person voted - they also had a signature. So there is "such a thing" as signature matching.

Irregularities with mail-in ballots resulted in almost 3% having been found to have some sort of problem in previous elections. It has the largest truck-sized at-risk factor of any vote format that we have.

History does not get deleted simply because it is 2020

QFT

 

[BobRyan]

QFT

Quantum Field Theory??

 

[Arcangl86]

What is the purpose of a signature audit at this point? Serious question.

 

[BobRyan]

What is the purpose of a signature audit at this point? Serious question.

It would be nice to know if people were filling in bogus ballots for other people or the same person filling in ballots for people that had no intention of voting etc.

The idea is to get an idea of the size of the problem -- so for example if it is merely a 100 fraud ballots then not much of a problem and the outcome is not in doubt - no change. If it is 10's of thousands or 100's of thousands then we have bigger problem than Russia sending out a few Tweets and emails to try and affect the outcome of an election.

Would be nice to address that size of a problem before we do the next election.