• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

  • The rule regarding AI content has been updated. The rule now rules as follows:

    Be sure to credit AI when copying and pasting AI sources. Link to the site of the AI search, just like linking to an article.

Status
Not open for further replies.

rmwilliamsll

avid reader
Mar 19, 2004
6,006
334
✟7,946.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Green
Seems to me that I saw an article in the last 6 months where human genes were traced mathematically back to common ancestors around 6000 years ago. Anyone recall or have a link to this?
This is not a scientific article.
the closest thing, afaik, is a genetic bottleneck at about 70kya with the human population down to between 2 and 10K individuals.
you can also google
"genetic eve" or "mitochrondrial eve"
and see a number of mitochrondrial studies showing common females at 120K-150K.
there is an excellent very readable book on the topic in the _Journey of Man_ by Spenser Wells, i believe that there is a DVD with the same information if you prefer.

the human population was well distributed around the world 6kya..
 
Upvote 0

rmwilliamsll

avid reader
Mar 19, 2004
6,006
334
✟7,946.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Green
I thank you for your help in the search criteria. This is what I was after.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2006-07-01-family-tree_x.htm
it would be worth pursuing this:

http://humphrysfamilytree.com/ca.math.html
http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/~landc/html/cann/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_genealogy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Seven_Daughters_of_Eve
from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most_recent_common_ancestor

nice background page:
http://www.duerinck.com/migrate.html

the big problem with what i am reading now is the confusion and conflation of the terms:
"descended from"
and
"related to"
he is consistently speaking about related to, yet all the YECists articles and most of the popular articles are drawing the parallel to mitochrondrial Eve and using the idea of descended from.

his 7Kya relation is just take a relation to everyone now living, not a last common ancestor.

btw:
the same kind of interesting data appears in both the Ghengis Khan genes and the Cohenate gene studies.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.