Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That article was originally on Foxnews.com when I first saw it. So there!Kids are not stupid. They know some of their schoolmates have two mommies or two daddies and that's okay. The other stuff about "increasing homosexuality rates" is not supported by anything but fear and being uninformed. That's what you get when you take a paranoid site like World Net Daily seriously.
That article was originally on Foxnews.com when I first saw it. So there!
That article was originally on Foxnews.com when I first saw it. So there!
It is preferred if you site the institution that actually does studies or the actual source text rather than the publication that reports it.
But if the article said what YOU wanted you would not ask for that info.That's kind of like saying "My car is a 1971 AMC Gremlin, no, wait, a '72!"
But if the article said what YOU wanted you would not ask for that info.
Just quit cryin' about it and accept it.
This is sorta relevant to the OP.
Last week, two of my dear friends got married!They have been together longer than I have known them--over 20 years! They went to City Hall, with family and friends, and a cute little old lady commissioner married them--I saw the pictures.
They have been truly supportive of each other in sickness and health, and have already lasted longer than many other couples. I am so happy and excited for them; I even got a little teary-eyed.
What a wonderful opportunity for them, to express their commitment to each other publicly, and gain the rights and responsibilities that all married couples get with their marriage certificates.
Yes, they are gay.
Umm, I'm not married (been there, done that), but if I were, their marriage would not affect mine at all, at all. How could it?
You just don't like what it says. It is a source, it is a real article, it is an actual bill that the governor signed. Man up to it.The world net daily???
I asked for an actual reference
Again I will have to assume that you cant provide actual references to back up your claim that your joke of a governor signed into law a bill requiring gay education to be taught in our public schools.
And I want to thank jamirlindas for posting the truth about what that joke of a governor signed into the law http://christianforums.com/showpost.php?p=48741293&postcount=38
And jamirlindas posted what that bill actually entailed. Which was nothing at all like the world nut daily or you have claimed.You just don't like what it says. It is a source, it is a real article, it is an actual bill that the governor signed. Man up to it.
Apparently not. *slaps forehead* What was I thinking?! Oh, right: they are two people who love and cherish each other, and are not under the authority of conservative Christianity.You are obviously oblivious to the scriptures that state marriage is to be solely between a man and a woman. Any other form of union between two people is apparently condemned by God. Unions such as the one you mention will surely result in the destruction of 'decent' life as we know it. Please pass this info on to your friends. They must annul this 'satanic' union at once.
Haven't you been paying attention, DrummerWench?
How so? Enlighten us
You just don't like what it says. It is a source, it is a real article, it is an actual bill that the governor signed. Man up to it.
You just don't like what it says. It is a source, it is a real article, it is an actual bill that the governor signed. Man up to it.
The correct definition of marriage, i.e., one man and one woman, has been redefined by a judicial oligarchy of four (i.e., Ron George and his three stooges) into something illegitimate and worthy of ridicule. Despite whatever sense of entitlement CA homosexuals may feel, there is no constitutional right to gay "marriage." If you want gay "marriage" then you need to do the hard work of passing an amendment like everyone else with a cause. The governor would be justified in setting aside the ruling and he should do so.
Alas, we're a relatively liberal state so I'm not that surprised by our representative government.Alas, we have a vapid RINO and not a true conservative in office.
Who defines the correct definition of marriage? What exactly makes a marriage correct? Sex? Gender? Children? Potential for children? Love? Companionship? Religion?
... i'll leave this open for discussion.
Marriage has been defined by God in the Bible.Marriage is defined by the people, as it always has been and always will be.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?