Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Galaxy rotation patterns are better explained by Birkeland currents than by dark matter.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Smithi" data-source="post: 73914040" data-attributes="member: 418885"><p>Dear Ian,</p><p>Many thanks to you for your kind letter.</p><p>Concerning magnetic reconnection in vacuum, I have nothing to add to Fig. 1.3 in</p><p>section 1.1.2. -- Reconnection like reconnection. Yes, in vacuum. Why not? --</p><p>During many years of teaching, I never met a student who did not understand this</p><p>ordinary process. They (students) understand easily that the parallel currents are</p><p>external currents relative to a reconnection region, for example, the vacuum tube</p><p>in the laboratory experiments Frank A.G. et al. in Moscow.</p><p>I guess that the Individual, which is claiming that the vacuum reconnection is</p><p>impossible, simply does not want to understand this simple but real case.</p><p>Reasons? - I do not know.</p><p>Well, unfortunately or fortunately, I am very busy. Together with one of my post-</p><p>graduate student, Pavel Gritsyk (very talent person), I have to complete work on</p><p>the thermal (T_e ~ 10 keV) runaway electrons and hard X-ray polarization in solar</p><p>flares.</p><p>Another young college, Leonid Ledentson (also very good scientist), writes the</p><p>text-book (the lectures) on the classical background of plasma astrophysics. So, he</p><p>is also busy. Anyway, I ask him to read carefully the web-site mentioned in your</p><p>letter. I hope he will find something useful in critics of me.</p><p>Thank you once again for your letter. With kind regards and best wishes,</p><p>Boris</p><p>03.05.2019</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Smithi, post: 73914040, member: 418885"] Dear Ian, Many thanks to you for your kind letter. Concerning magnetic reconnection in vacuum, I have nothing to add to Fig. 1.3 in section 1.1.2. -- Reconnection like reconnection. Yes, in vacuum. Why not? -- During many years of teaching, I never met a student who did not understand this ordinary process. They (students) understand easily that the parallel currents are external currents relative to a reconnection region, for example, the vacuum tube in the laboratory experiments Frank A.G. et al. in Moscow. I guess that the Individual, which is claiming that the vacuum reconnection is impossible, simply does not want to understand this simple but real case. Reasons? - I do not know. Well, unfortunately or fortunately, I am very busy. Together with one of my post- graduate student, Pavel Gritsyk (very talent person), I have to complete work on the thermal (T_e ~ 10 keV) runaway electrons and hard X-ray polarization in solar flares. Another young college, Leonid Ledentson (also very good scientist), writes the text-book (the lectures) on the classical background of plasma astrophysics. So, he is also busy. Anyway, I ask him to read carefully the web-site mentioned in your letter. I hope he will find something useful in critics of me. Thank you once again for your letter. With kind regards and best wishes, Boris 03.05.2019 [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Galaxy rotation patterns are better explained by Birkeland currents than by dark matter.
Top
Bottom