Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Galaxy rotation patterns are better explained by Birkeland currents than by dark matter.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sjastro" data-source="post: 73851923" data-attributes="member: 352921"><p>Not one single link you have supplied doesn't even mention the term Birkeland current let alone is an example of one.</p><p>Your first <a href="https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21028174-900-universes-highest-electric-current-found/" target="_blank">link</a> is an example.</p><p>You see the word "current" and read it as a Birkeland current, likewise you see a picture of M82 with a filament structure so it must be a Birkeland current despite the contrary evidence.</p><p>You are so blinded by your own prejudice you read and see things in articles that are not there.</p><p></p><p></p><p>This is a classic strawman and highly dishonest for you to even suggest you understand the maths while your explanation of the plasma processes is one of confusion as you think Birkeland currents and plasma are interchangeable terms.</p><p>I suggest to acquire a knowledge of basic science such as understanding the difference between plasma and an electrical current.</p><p></p><p>You should also brush up on your high school algebra.</p><p>Didn't you learn early in your maths education at school that for a mathematical formula, whatever you do to the left hand side of the equation, you do to the right hand side as well.</p><p>That's the magnitude of Scott's error because he ignored this fundamental rule in algebra when tinkering with the Lundquist equations with Maxwell's (illogical in itself) leading to his nonsensical equations in particular</p><p> jθ (r) = α/µ(Bz (0)) J1 (αr) which contradicts the current being field aligned.</p><p></p><p>Once again you are deluding yourself. There is no evidence.</p><p>While Birkeland currents have been observed in the magnetospheres of planets, the idea that Birkeland currents link the Sun to the Earth and Saturn violates the laws of physics because there is no external magnetic field to the solar wind.</p><p>For the umpteenth time this is supported by the fact that Birkeland currents have never been measured outside the Earth's magnetosphere.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Here is an image of M81 and M82 in the same field.</p><p>According to mainstream, the streamers and filaments in M82 is suspected to be caused by the <a href="http://amazingspace.org/uploads/pdf/name/12/lp_m82_a_starburst_galaxy.pdf" target="_blank">gravitational interaction with M81.</a></p><p><img src="https://s22380.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2017-03-15_58c8e6bb2cd15_M81_M82.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p>Your own standard of pareidolia fails you.</p><p>Where is the Birkeland current connecting the galaxies in particular since counter rotating gas has been found in M82?</p><p>Furthermore how do you explain this "Birkeland current" being mysteriously truncated on both sides which goes nowhere.</p><p>Using your own standards the picture clearly illustrates Scott's model is a total failure.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sjastro, post: 73851923, member: 352921"] Not one single link you have supplied doesn't even mention the term Birkeland current let alone is an example of one. Your first [URL='https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21028174-900-universes-highest-electric-current-found/']link[/URL] is an example. You see the word "current" and read it as a Birkeland current, likewise you see a picture of M82 with a filament structure so it must be a Birkeland current despite the contrary evidence. You are so blinded by your own prejudice you read and see things in articles that are not there. This is a classic strawman and highly dishonest for you to even suggest you understand the maths while your explanation of the plasma processes is one of confusion as you think Birkeland currents and plasma are interchangeable terms. I suggest to acquire a knowledge of basic science such as understanding the difference between plasma and an electrical current. You should also brush up on your high school algebra. Didn't you learn early in your maths education at school that for a mathematical formula, whatever you do to the left hand side of the equation, you do to the right hand side as well. That's the magnitude of Scott's error because he ignored this fundamental rule in algebra when tinkering with the Lundquist equations with Maxwell's (illogical in itself) leading to his nonsensical equations in particular jθ (r) = α/µ(Bz (0)) J1 (αr) which contradicts the current being field aligned. Once again you are deluding yourself. There is no evidence. While Birkeland currents have been observed in the magnetospheres of planets, the idea that Birkeland currents link the Sun to the Earth and Saturn violates the laws of physics because there is no external magnetic field to the solar wind. For the umpteenth time this is supported by the fact that Birkeland currents have never been measured outside the Earth's magnetosphere. Here is an image of M81 and M82 in the same field. According to mainstream, the streamers and filaments in M82 is suspected to be caused by the [URL='http://amazingspace.org/uploads/pdf/name/12/lp_m82_a_starburst_galaxy.pdf']gravitational interaction with M81.[/URL] [IMG]https://s22380.pcdn.co/wp-content/uploads/2017-03-15_58c8e6bb2cd15_M81_M82.jpg[/IMG] Your own standard of pareidolia fails you. Where is the Birkeland current connecting the galaxies in particular since counter rotating gas has been found in M82? Furthermore how do you explain this "Birkeland current" being mysteriously truncated on both sides which goes nowhere. Using your own standards the picture clearly illustrates Scott's model is a total failure. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Galaxy rotation patterns are better explained by Birkeland currents than by dark matter.
Top
Bottom