Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Galaxy rotation patterns are better explained by Birkeland currents than by dark matter.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael" data-source="post: 73851641" data-attributes="member: 627"><p>As the saying goes: "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make them drink".</p><p></p><p>I've demonstrated that massive electrical currents <a href="https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21028174-900-universes-highest-electric-current-found/" target="_blank">have already been observed</a> in space. I've demonstrated that GeoSpace scientists already accept the fact that space is "<a href="https://eos.org/editors-vox/electric-currents-in-outer-space-run-the-show" target="_blank">fundamentally electrical in nature</a>". I've explained the counter rotation prediction benefits of Scott's model, and <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1263" target="_blank">I've cited the literature</a> that demonstrates that counter rotation in almost every type of galaxy has already been documented. I've explained the Marklund current prediction of the Birkeland current model and shown how that ionization state separation prediction has also already been observed in at least one of those counter rotating galaxies. I've explained that Scott's Birkeland current model is completely consistent with the standard model of particle physics, whereas the dark matter model is not compatible with the standard model of particle physics.</p><p></p><p>I even took it a step further and I<a href="https://www.christianforums.com/threads/galaxy-rotation-patterns-are-better-explained-by-birkeland-currents-than-by-dark-matter.8108740/page-2#post-73840561" target="_blank"> pointed out some of the math errors</a> made by Scott's critics, and <a href="https://www.christianforums.com/threads/galaxy-rotation-patterns-are-better-explained-by-birkeland-currents-than-by-dark-matter.8108740/page-3#post-73845031" target="_blank">I can explain and have explained the physical processes in plasma in great detail for anyone who *wants* to understand it</a>.</p><p></p><p>Suffice to say that Birkeland currents are known to affect our own atmosphere, <a href="https://www.space.com/1940-space-slinky-confirms-theory-twist.html" target="_blank">there is observational evidence of the existence of Birkeland Currents in space</a>, and they've been <a href="http://www.ptep-online.com/2015/PP-41-13.PDF" target="_blank">mathematically modeled in great detail</a>. The evidence to <a href="https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24102-black-hole-ejects-space-slinky-in-hubble-movie/" target="_blank">support their existence in space </a>is *overwhelming*. "Magnetic ropes"/field aligned Birkeland currents have been observed to connect the sun to the Earth and the sun to Saturn. Furthermore, the physics of plasma is known to scale many orders of magnitude.</p><p></p><p>However, the one thing that I cannot do is force anyone deal with the <a href="https://youtu.be/Ya2OXXgn8FU" target="_blank">observational evidence that supports the Birkeland Current model</a>, even when it's <a href="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/M82_HST_ACS_2006-14-a-large_web.jpg" target="_blank">staring them in the face in numerous wavelengths</a>.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael, post: 73851641, member: 627"] As the saying goes: "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make them drink". I've demonstrated that massive electrical currents [URL='https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21028174-900-universes-highest-electric-current-found/']have already been observed[/URL] in space. I've demonstrated that GeoSpace scientists already accept the fact that space is "[URL='https://eos.org/editors-vox/electric-currents-in-outer-space-run-the-show']fundamentally electrical in nature[/URL]". I've explained the counter rotation prediction benefits of Scott's model, and [URL='https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1263']I've cited the literature[/URL] that demonstrates that counter rotation in almost every type of galaxy has already been documented. I've explained the Marklund current prediction of the Birkeland current model and shown how that ionization state separation prediction has also already been observed in at least one of those counter rotating galaxies. I've explained that Scott's Birkeland current model is completely consistent with the standard model of particle physics, whereas the dark matter model is not compatible with the standard model of particle physics. I even took it a step further and I[URL='https://www.christianforums.com/threads/galaxy-rotation-patterns-are-better-explained-by-birkeland-currents-than-by-dark-matter.8108740/page-2#post-73840561'] pointed out some of the math errors[/URL] made by Scott's critics, and [URL='https://www.christianforums.com/threads/galaxy-rotation-patterns-are-better-explained-by-birkeland-currents-than-by-dark-matter.8108740/page-3#post-73845031']I can explain and have explained the physical processes in plasma in great detail for anyone who *wants* to understand it[/URL]. Suffice to say that Birkeland currents are known to affect our own atmosphere, [URL='https://www.space.com/1940-space-slinky-confirms-theory-twist.html']there is observational evidence of the existence of Birkeland Currents in space[/URL], and they've been [URL='http://www.ptep-online.com/2015/PP-41-13.PDF']mathematically modeled in great detail[/URL]. The evidence to [URL='https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn24102-black-hole-ejects-space-slinky-in-hubble-movie/']support their existence in space [/URL]is *overwhelming*. "Magnetic ropes"/field aligned Birkeland currents have been observed to connect the sun to the Earth and the sun to Saturn. Furthermore, the physics of plasma is known to scale many orders of magnitude. However, the one thing that I cannot do is force anyone deal with the [URL='https://youtu.be/Ya2OXXgn8FU']observational evidence that supports the Birkeland Current model[/URL], even when it's [URL='https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/M82_HST_ACS_2006-14-a-large_web.jpg']staring them in the face in numerous wavelengths[/URL]. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Galaxy rotation patterns are better explained by Birkeland currents than by dark matter.
Top
Bottom