Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Galaxy rotation patterns are better explained by Birkeland currents than by dark matter.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Michael" data-source="post: 73840783" data-attributes="member: 627"><p><a href="https://www.space.com/1940-space-slinky-confirms-theory-twist.html" target="_blank">Space 'Slinky' Confirms Theory with a Twist</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birkeland_current" target="_blank">Birkeland current - Wikipedia</a></p><p></p><p><img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/12/Magnetic_rope.svg/600px-Magnetic_rope.svg.png" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>That "helical" shape of the magnetic field is a direct result of the Birkeland current that sustains it. Here again we see observational evidence that the Birkeland current is directly related to a "stellar nursery" where new stars are forming due to the mass movements through the filament.</p><p></p><p>By they way, plasma in space is dusty. It's never fully ionized. Rather in includes all sorts of solids liquids and gases that are not ionized, but could contain static electricity and even act a bit like a plasma with respect to being influenced by EM fields.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Michael, post: 73840783, member: 627"] [URL='https://www.space.com/1940-space-slinky-confirms-theory-twist.html']Space 'Slinky' Confirms Theory with a Twist[/URL] [URL="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birkeland_current"]Birkeland current - Wikipedia[/URL] [img]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/12/Magnetic_rope.svg/600px-Magnetic_rope.svg.png[/img] That "helical" shape of the magnetic field is a direct result of the Birkeland current that sustains it. Here again we see observational evidence that the Birkeland current is directly related to a "stellar nursery" where new stars are forming due to the mass movements through the filament. By they way, plasma in space is dusty. It's never fully ionized. Rather in includes all sorts of solids liquids and gases that are not ionized, but could contain static electricity and even act a bit like a plasma with respect to being influenced by EM fields. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Galaxy rotation patterns are better explained by Birkeland currents than by dark matter.
Top
Bottom