Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Galaxy rotation patterns are better explained by Birkeland currents than by dark matter.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SelfSim" data-source="post: 73833961" data-attributes="member: 354922"><p>Michael continually throws stones at consistent mainstream models and yet he has demonstrated nothing more than arm-waving in support of his favoured, yet demonstrably, gobbledygook 'alternatives' (such as Scott's model).</p><p></p><p>Scott's so called 'Birkeland Current' based model is fundamentally flawed by bad math and inconsistently (mis)applied physics principles.</p><p></p><p>Michael's argument boils down to the inane: <em>'Mainstream must be wrong .. therefore the ill considered alternative I threw at it, must be right'</em>.</p><p></p><p>I agree that there should be not much more to say about his favoured ideas from that point onwards. Unfortunately, I think we all know that we're going to see inumerable pages more from him on it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SelfSim, post: 73833961, member: 354922"] Michael continually throws stones at consistent mainstream models and yet he has demonstrated nothing more than arm-waving in support of his favoured, yet demonstrably, gobbledygook 'alternatives' (such as Scott's model). Scott's so called 'Birkeland Current' based model is fundamentally flawed by bad math and inconsistently (mis)applied physics principles. Michael's argument boils down to the inane: [I]'Mainstream must be wrong .. therefore the ill considered alternative I threw at it, must be right'[/I]. I agree that there should be not much more to say about his favoured ideas from that point onwards. Unfortunately, I think we all know that we're going to see inumerable pages more from him on it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Galaxy rotation patterns are better explained by Birkeland currents than by dark matter.
Top
Bottom