Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Fun with the Flood math.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="notto" data-source="post: 749157" data-attributes="member: 2918"><p>So, let us assume that there were not mountains in the days of the flood. The bible says that the waters were 15 cubits deep (roughly 20 some feet) above the "hills". If this is the case, how could that little amount of water kill everything, bury everything several hundred feet deep and create sedimentary rock layers several hundred feet thick. It doesn't even sound like it could cover the tallest tree.</p><p></p><p>I think that the estimates for the amount of water that sprang forth from the deep or that came from on high that creationists use are an OVER estimate. The amount needed to do the amount of damage they account to the flood would hardly seem to be capable with only 15 cubits deep water. </p><p></p><p>How could this amount of water suspend all of the sediment that is suppose to be acounted for by the flood?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="notto, post: 749157, member: 2918"] So, let us assume that there were not mountains in the days of the flood. The bible says that the waters were 15 cubits deep (roughly 20 some feet) above the "hills". If this is the case, how could that little amount of water kill everything, bury everything several hundred feet deep and create sedimentary rock layers several hundred feet thick. It doesn't even sound like it could cover the tallest tree. I think that the estimates for the amount of water that sprang forth from the deep or that came from on high that creationists use are an OVER estimate. The amount needed to do the amount of damage they account to the flood would hardly seem to be capable with only 15 cubits deep water. How could this amount of water suspend all of the sediment that is suppose to be acounted for by the flood? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Fun with the Flood math.
Top
Bottom