Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
FTC Announces Ban on Non-Competes
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iluvatar5150" data-source="post: 77653117" data-attributes="member: 313046"><p>And comforting to those who'd wish to keep their payrolls costs low by suppressing wages.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>"Direct competitor" can be extremely broad. If your skills apply to only one industry (like many do), then that more-or-less prohibits the employee from moving anywhere. My company, for example, doesn't have a non-compete, but we do have policies against moonlighting with competitors, where "competitors" includes everybody in our entire medium (video games), globally. If they'd tried to enforce a non-compete with those definitions, then I'd have to switch mediums to something like film or concert production, which would amount to, essentially, a career change.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That's nice, but largely irrelevant for most workers.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Many of those "fools" are merely people looking for work in a market where employers have the upper hand. Not accepting their terms can often mean not working at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iluvatar5150, post: 77653117, member: 313046"] And comforting to those who'd wish to keep their payrolls costs low by suppressing wages. "Direct competitor" can be extremely broad. If your skills apply to only one industry (like many do), then that more-or-less prohibits the employee from moving anywhere. My company, for example, doesn't have a non-compete, but we do have policies against moonlighting with competitors, where "competitors" includes everybody in our entire medium (video games), globally. If they'd tried to enforce a non-compete with those definitions, then I'd have to switch mediums to something like film or concert production, which would amount to, essentially, a career change. That's nice, but largely irrelevant for most workers. Many of those "fools" are merely people looking for work in a market where employers have the upper hand. Not accepting their terms can often mean not working at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
FTC Announces Ban on Non-Competes
Top
Bottom