• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Free Traders Case For Tariffs

Status
Not open for further replies.

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,057
57
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,962,858.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,057
57
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,962,858.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
Many have deemed them that way for years. It is not like some are making a concerted effort to understand them.
We understand them. Hence, my comment.
 
Upvote 0

Hammster

Carpe Chaos
Site Supporter
Apr 5, 2007
144,404
27,057
57
New Jerusalem
Visit site
✟1,962,858.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Married
The stock market will correct itself.
 
Upvote 0

stevil

Godless and without morals
Feb 5, 2011
8,548
6,729
✟293,653.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Democrats have never seen a tax they didn’t like, until it came to tariffs
All of them, They've all said this?

Some of them don't like heavy taxes on the poor,
Some don't like flat taxes

Or am I just imagining that?
 
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0

FreeinChrist

CF Advisory team
Christian Forums Staff
Site Advisor
Site Supporter
Jul 2, 2003
152,293
19,806
USA
✟2,078,323.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
9,226
9,987
PA
✟434,849.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Since the tariffs are reciprocal - (def. Expressing mutual action or relationship) - It is an easy way to reduce US tariffs - reduce yours.
Except they're not. The value that Trump is using to calculate a country's "tariffs" that he's reciprocating is actually the trade deficit (specifically the ratio of our goods trade deficit with the country to our total imports from the country). And everyone is getting 10% at minimum, regardless.

Lesotho, for example, does not actually place a 99% tariff on US imports. They just don't buy much of anything from us (being a small, impoverished country), so the ratio of trade deficit to imports approaches 1.

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Raised by bees
Mar 11, 2017
22,096
16,614
55
USA
✟418,864.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Irrelevant. Thus it is void.
It is? I don't think so. It was the ideological commitment of the GOP to liberal economics that drove them to support free trade and the lowering of tarifs for years and years. Why has the GOP shifted its economic ideology to 1890?
 
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
3,161
2,021
traveling Asia
✟135,844.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
So the charts in the article cherry pick products and countries. I could do the same for the USA. The tariffs are way overboard, well beyond reciprocal.
So for their efforts Israel's tariffs are 17% https://www.timesofisrael.com/liveblog-april-03-2025/ The tariffs are punitive and unrealistic, they are not reciprocal. Trump will probably lift/reduce them in a week or less for many countries. The markets seems to think this. Japan down just 3%.
 
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

loveofourlord

Newbie
Feb 15, 2014
9,131
5,088
✟325,393.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I'm curious as I said, does ANY country have a real trade deficit with the US, maybe it's just me, but expecting Canadians to pay as much as the us with 8X's the population, though we end up paying 10X's more per capita. Funny how a country so much more massive only spends 105 billion vs canada's arund 120+ billion hmmm...sounds to me like the US is ripping off canada.
 
Upvote 0

Nithavela

you're in charge you can do it just get louis
Apr 14, 2007
30,732
22,389
Comb. Pizza Hut and Taco Bell/Jamaica Avenue.
✟592,582.00
Country
Germany
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
3,161
2,021
traveling Asia
✟135,844.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
 
Upvote 0

Richard T

Well-Known Member
Mar 25, 2018
3,161
2,021
traveling Asia
✟135,844.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
The New World Order likes cooperation and globalization. This is the default position of both democrats and republicans. before Trump the last one that challenged the free trade assumptions was perhaps as far back as Sen. Gephardt when he ran for President. (1980s) or Ross Perot. Trump always stood out because he does not care much about globalization at all.

So, many Americans were left behind by globalists (which increases wealth concentrations) and Trump become popular. He branded MAGA and really has some serious believers. Rather than succeed, I think the USA is more likely to become like some of the 1960s, South American dictators, that decided to go inward looking for production rather than be dependent on the Western nations. Most if not all had dismal results. Smaller nations especially have to be tied into the world system.

"Liberation day" and "golden age" are likely more doublespeak terms just like "inflation reduction Act" or even "affordable care" health insurance.

It is however, possible that Trump is using these tariffs to negotiate better deals. Wall Street seems to be somewhat ignoring these overreaching tariffs. Japan only down 3% today. If the tariffs were seen as lasting, I think 30% or more would be appropriate.
To those that think reciprocal tariffs can be measured I would ask how? It would be easier if truly it was just tariffs, but otherwise it takes months of analysis to even come close to knowing what fair might be because it is non tariff barriers that are in play and these do not have hard money figures. The trade balance can be measured easily, but trade in goods and services is never supposed to be equal either all the time. The balancing happens with investment and also with currency rates over time. Suppose coffee or sugar shoot up drastically because of a drought. The world shifts towards certain countries and trade deficits climb for those in drought and go to surplus for those with no drought. One would have to adjust all the time.
There is a conservative case to be made for some tariffs. The main justification is for security. Yes, you need drug manufacturing, metals, defense, and even agriculture, etc. for defensive purposes. Israel should subsidize its kibbutz. It is a way of life for some and important for Israel. Likewise, our farmers are often compensated with subsidies.

When farm subsidies occur in US or EU, for exports of corn or other ag products, the poor developing country farmer often gets no subsidy and can no longer compete. With no other prospects some subsidies actually can starve them. So the system is not going to ever balance completely. Trump was not wrong to try but unless he loosens things up fairly quickly and quits with all the hard percentages and talk, the USA will be in for a rough ride. Few are going to bring factories back. It takes lead times of a year or two to source a factory and who know when Trump or even the next President may reverse course.

Think too that huge manufacturers will just shift production because they have facilities all around the world. I saw a company that made candy in both the USA and EU. Because they ship to Canada, with higher tariffs there for stuff coming from the USA, they will simply add another shift in the EU factories and lay off the Americans that were needed for the Canadian production. Smaller businesses often centered in single nations however may be stuck in a high tariff location like Vietnam. Great, efficient producers can really be hurt.

Trade policy too might destabilize some countries leading to unrest or at a minimum hatred toward the USA. Tesla is hurt now, will coke and Starbucks be next? So quite a shift in policy. Trump's policies are too much, too far, too fast, and in some cases involve the wrong nations. They are mercantilist if he does not make any adjustments. A conservative response to free trade is to assist in promoting it. Gradual adjustments should be fostered to increase fair trade. At the same time though, the desire for deeper levels of worldwide integration (military and political) should be thwarted.
 
Last edited:
Reactions: Laodicean60
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.