Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Where is such a plan from Congress or the President?Thank you for your insight, ie., "They have stuff and we buy stuff". I think the rube in this discussion is not the administration.
Bring manufacturing stuff back to the US. Investment in plant and equipment first, training employees simultaneously. Tax those higher paying jobs at the current tax rates to reduce the the ongoing unsustainable federal deficits. How's that for a starter?
What specific imported cars do we need? What specific electronics do we need? That the US has been taken advantage of by our international competitors (and adversaries) is exactly why the administration is moving to balance trade deficits.
Precisely the problem being addressed by the administration's trade policy to bring back those higher paying jobs to the US. Or do you want to just keep the hamburger flipper jobs?
You missed the boat. If only it were that simple. The truth is there are all kinds of tariffs and taxes on U.S. goods plus price manipulation by foreign countries. The trade deals that are being negotiated will only be agreed upon if the deals are FAIR TO BOTH SIDES.
Can you support your claims with citations from reputable source?The result, so far, has been to kill our exports overseas. Canada is a great example, where people are intentionally refusing to buy products from the US. There are also those businesses that used to manufacture products in the US and are closing down their plants here, since many of the customers were overseas and, due to the tariffs, they can't sell the US made products overseas anymore. Instead, they are starting to move their factories outside the US, so they can keep their businesses going. And this doesn't include businesses like Target and Walmart, who told Pres. Trump that their shelves will be empty because they are losing the Chinese suppliers for their goods.
Penguins. What is a fair tariff on an island of penguins?You missed the boat. If only it were that simple. The truth is there are all kinds of tariffs and taxes on U.S. goods plus price manipulation by foreign countries. The trade deals that are being negotiated will only be agreed upon if the deals are FAIR TO BOTH SIDES.
As I have mentioned in this and other threads, it's all about jobs, always has been, and likely will always be.Nearly 80 percent of cars priced at less than $30,000 will be subject to 25 percent tariffs, including popular vehicles like the Honda Civic, Toyota Corolla and Chevrolet Trax, according to Cox Automotive.
Not who, where. "The president" is not a location, nor a plan.The President.
No. Balancing a trade deficit requires an increase in exports and/or a decrease in imports. The tariffs applied to unfair trading partners will do exactly that.The U.S. cannot balance the trade deficit and simultaneously bring jobs back to America. Balancing the trade deficit requires opening our market to foreign countries, allowing them to sell products here while they reciprocate.
We will not solve our trade deficit by tariffing the goods of developing nations. We will solve it by tariffing developed countries who trade unfairly with the US.However, "Made in America" products are often more expensive than those from developing nations, which means their consumers won’t buy American products if cheaper alternatives exist.
Then you should have asked that as your question.Not who, where. "The president" is not a location, nor a plan.
Care to rephrase?Where is such a plan from Congress or the President?
Where is such a plan (an industrial plan) from the President or Congress?Then you should have asked that as your question.
Care to rephrase?
Asked and answered.Where is such a plan (an industrial plan) from the President or Congress?
Provide a link to President Trump's industrial policy document. It could be from his campaign, or the White House.Thank you for your insight, ie., "They have stuff and we buy stuff". I think the rube in this discussion is not the administration.
Bring manufacturing stuff back to the US. Investment in plant and equipment first, training employees simultaneously. Tax those higher paying jobs at the current tax rates to reduce the the ongoing unsustainable federal deficits. How's that for a starter?
No. Balancing a trade deficit requires an increase in exports and/or a decrease in imports. The tariffs applied to unfair trading partners will do exactly that.
We will not solve our trade deficit by tariffing the goods of developing nations. We will solve it by tariffing developed countries who trade unfairly with the US.
As to cheaper alternatives, do you not think China's use of slave labor to offer cheaper alternatives immoral? Or developing countries using children often in unsafe working environments to offer cheaper alternatives immoral?
No, this tariff I agree with. It was actually brilliant. It turns out that the Legion of Doom, at behest of Lex Luthor, had hidden their resources on the island to avoid being taxed or tariffed. But now their plan is foiled! Don't believe me? Just listen to the man himself, you can find him confessing in a SolidJJs video. Decided to remove it due to language, even if warned about it.Penguins. What is a fair tariff on an island of penguins?
HIs EO's suffice to indicate his industrial policy. Exactly what he campaigned on doing and duly elected to do.Provide a link to President Trump's industrial policy document. It could be from his campaign, or the White House.
The tariffs are not imposed on all countries.If you agree that increasing exports to developing nations is not feasible, then why is the administration imposing tariffs on all countries? What is the rationale behind imposing a 25% tariff on Vietnam or Bangladesh?
That is tariff policy, not industrial policy.HIs EO's suffice to indicate his industrial policy. Exactly what he campaigned on doing and duly elected to do.
Signed: April 29, 2025 Published: May 2, 2025 FR Citation: 90 FR 18907 FR Doc. Number: 2025-07835 PDF 3 pages See: Proc. 9704, March 8, 2018; Proc. 9705, March 8, 2018; Proc. 9980, January 24, 2020; EO 14193, February 1, 2025; EO 14194, February 1, 2025; EO 14197, February 3, 2025; EO 14198, February 3, 2025; Proc. 10895, February 10, 2025; Proc. 10896, February 10, 2025; EO 14226, March 2, 2025; EO 14227, March 2, 2025; March 2, 2025; EO 14231, March 6, 2025; EO 14232, March 6, 2025; Proc. 10908, March 26, 2025
Do you have a summary? No one is going to watch a multi-hour hearing that may not have anything connection to reality.As to Congress, as always, the legislative process is slow but making progress through the appropriate committees.
Made in the USA: Igniting the Industrial Renaissance of the United States - United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountability
United States House Committee on Oversight and Accountabilityoversight.house.gov
As I have mentioned in this and other threads, it's all about jobs, always has been, and likely will always be.
Countries use tariffs to export their country's high-paying-jobs-unemployment problem to another.
April 4, 2025New Auto Tariffs Are Now in Place, Driving the Industry into Uncharted Territory - Cox Automotive Inc.
It’s on! As our Chief Economist Jonathan Smoke feared, the “unthinkable” has happened. New automotive-specific tariffs of 25% on all imported vehicles are now in place. Finished automobiles are no longer flowing freely across North America, and key automotive free trade agreements have been...www.coxautoinc.com
As our team has noted before, tariffs can be effective tools to level international playing fields and grow domestic manufacturing. How they are implemented, however, matters. The size and structure of the global auto industry make rapid change difficult at best – factories take time to build, supply chains years to create, and workforces cannot be developed overnight. In the auto industry, sudden changes usually produce only one result: Chaos.
“If you make your car in the United States, you’re going to make a lot of money,” he told NBC News in an interview Saturday. “If you don’t, you’re going to have to probably come to the United States, because if you make your car in the United States, there is no tariff.”There’s no such thing as a fully American-made car
Trump indicated consumers could avoid tariffs by buying vehicles built entirely in the U.S., but industry experts say there’s not a single one with all-domestic parts and assembly.www.nbcnews.com
As to the actual tariff applied, the administration listened to automotive experts.
Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Incentivizes Domestic Automobile Production
INCENTIVIZING DOMESTIC AUTO PRODUCTION: Today, President Donald J. Trump signed a proclamation to protect national security by incentivizing domesticwww.whitehouse.gov
April 29, 2025
It offers an offset to a portion of tariffs for automobile parts used in U.S.-assembled vehicles equal to 3.75% of the Manufacturer’s Suggested Retail Price (MSRP) of a manufacturer’s U.S. production for the next year (April 3, 2025 to April 30, 2026), and 2.5% of U.S. production the year after (May 1, 2026 to April 30, 2027).
- These percentages reflect the duty that would be owed when a 25% duty is applied to 15% of the value of a U.S.-assembled automobile in the first year, and to 10% of the value of a U.S.-assembled automobile in the second year.
- All other automobile imports will still be subject to the 25% tariff.
- For instance, if a manufacturer builds a car in the U.S. that has 85% U.S. or USMCA content, the manufacturer effectively will not owe tariffs on that vehicle’s production for the first year.
- If a manufacturer builds a car in the U.S. that is 50% U.S. or USMCA content and 50% imported from elsewhere, then instead of paying the tariff on the full 50% of the imported car parts, the manufacturer effectively only pays on 35% for the first year.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?