• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Francis S Collins' Book

Tinker Grey

Wanderer
Site Supporter
Feb 6, 2002
11,815
6,374
Erewhon
Visit site
✟1,204,829.00
Faith
Atheist
I read it. I didn't find it particularly inspiring. In fact I can't remember much about it.

Let's see. He properly castigates those that refuse to believe evolution due to incredulity but ironically (within paragraphs, if memory serves) relies on incredulity to require God to jump start the universe.

Nevertheless, there was some science to learn. Since I don't store some of that very well, I think I was learning something. Stuff about cloning, etc. ETA: I thought his handling of ethics (like cloning) of biology was refreshing coming from an evangelical.

However, it would be most useful to hand to your evangelical friends to show that you can accept what science shows without giving up religion.
 
Upvote 0

Targ

Regular Member
Sep 4, 2010
653
19
NSW, Australia
✟23,418.00
Faith
Marital Status
Married
I read it a few months ago. I thought the book was quite sparse in content compared to Ken Miller's books, focussing on just a few issues rather than doing a complete job of it. Though what he said about genetics was fascinating, given that I hadn't really read much about genetics before.
 
Upvote 0

matthewgar

Newbie
Jun 18, 2010
699
25
powell river BC. Canada.
✟23,465.00
Faith
Marital Status
Private
Politics
CA-Others
I never read the first one, but read the second one on the idea of revolutionizing medicine by learning and using what we know of genes and DNA to try to help catch possible problems ahead of time. It looks good, though saw in skeptic magazine while bored, that someone felt that it may cause more problems then good, with more armchair doctors using what is still new to try to fix things that arn't 100% known. Like alot of the genes just increase chances, but there are alot of outside factors that can influence wether someone gets breast cancer or such.
 
Upvote 0
Jul 2, 2009
198
7
Portland, OR
✟22,860.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I gave it an attempt once & was turned off by the first or second chapter. He doesn't seem to subject his religious beliefs to the same level of criticism as I'm sure he does to his science and lost my attention right there. There was obvious compartmentalization. Right off the bat, he falls victim to the god of the gaps & makes unsupported assumptions (I don't remember details off hand), and of course assumes the christian god is responsible. Had he been raised in Iran, his book would have been "the language of allah."
 
Upvote 0