Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
A global flood requires a supernatural being to suspend or supersede natural law. So does the local flood theory. However, the local flood theory seeks to find an explanation other than that which was reported by God, which means your theory has no invisible means of support.Hang on a moment. Are you claiming that such suspension is a criticism for a theory? Because if so, I think the idea of a global flood has a whole lot more problems.
Glaciers in the Middle East?When the glaciers melted they left natural land damns behind.
There hasn't been global warming for 18 years. Climate alarmists now say "climate change."Even today this is still an issue with global warming flooding.
Unless you made your own topographical maps, you won't find any that rim the Middle East with a water solid barrier.I studied all the elevation maps for the area to confirm my theory.
I'm not the one disputing that.One thing you have to remember is that the Bible has been proven again and again to be absolute truth.
It's not the things that are ambiguous that give you problems, it's the plainly written literal text.We are reading a book written 3500 years ago, so we may not always understand.
In some places yes, in others no. In some places you have to understand the culture to understand the meaning.Plus the Bible is written in a way so that there are multiple layers of understanding and meaning.
The term "climate change" has been around since the 50s; as has the term "global warming", meant to refer to one specific aspect of climate change. A simple search through Google Books or the peer-reviewed literature.There hasn't been global warming for 18 years. Climate alarmists now say "climate change."
A global flood requires a supernatural being to suspend or supersede natural law. So does the local flood theory. However, the local flood theory seeks to find an explanation other than that which was reported by God, which means your theory has no invisible means of support.
No one is doing that. Concepts such as a worldwide flood, or even a local one, have no evidentiary support and in fact tons of evidence that says it did not happen.Rejecting concepts simply because they were written long ago is fallacious reasoning because the premise is seriously flawed.
No one is doing that. Concepts such as a worldwide flood, or even a local one, have no evidentiary support and in fact tons of evidence that says it did not happen.
Believing ancient concepts simply because they agree with your religion is fallacious reasoning because the premise is seriously flawed.
Satellites show no ‘global warming’ for 18 1/2 years – No N. Pole warming for nearly 14 years – No S. Pole warming for 37 years! sourceThis is a stupid, easily-debunked myth.
If you don't understand that God can supersede natural law, then you have no understanding of God.So in other words: "it's fair to suspend the laws of nature when it's my belief that's in question", does that about sum it up?
I am referring to the constant statements which atheists are fond of making that such concepts were written long ago as if that were enough in itself for a rejection.
Roy Spencer, John Christy, and William Braswell of the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH) Earth System Science Center recently released Version 6 (V.6) of their global satellite temperature dataset.
If you don't understand that God can supersede natural law, then you have no understanding of God.
A global flood requires a supernatural being to suspend or supersede natural law. So does the local flood theory. However, the local flood theory seeks to find an explanation other than that which was reported by God, which means your theory has no invisible means of support.
At any rate if a Noah's Flood did happen there should be evidence for it. There is none.Why does the being have to be supernatural?
Technologically advanced beings could accomplish things that appear to us as if they are defying natural laws. In fact, if we could place someone from our distant past in our time that person would conclude that we are suspending natural laws.
2. No creationist can be a true scientist retort is called the no True Scotsman fallacy. That fallacy flies in the face of the tons of evidence which proves your assumption to be totally bogus.
Glaciers in the Middle East?
Natural dams with no evidence whatever?
There hasn't been global warming for 18 years. Climate alarmists now say "climate change."
Unless you made your own topographical maps, you won't find any that rim the Middle East with a water solid barrier.
I'm not the one disputing that.
It's not the things that are ambiguous that give you problems, it's the plainly written literal text.
In some places yes, in others no. In some places you have to understand the culture to understand the meaning.
There is tons of evidence that the Bible is true and that the story of Noah is accurate. This is what domestication is all about and this is how farming spread from the Middle East to the rest of the world.At any rate if a Noah's Flood did happen there should be evidence for it. There is none.
There is tons of evidence that the Bible is true and that the story of Noah is accurate. This is what domestication is all about and this is how farming spread from the Middle East to the rest of the world.
Natural law holds that water will flow to a more or less uniform level relative to the core of the planet. Whether water was stacked upon itself or whether there was a global flood, either case requires a circumstance that is not replicable using natural law. Since nothing in the natural world can supersede natural law, the answer must lie with the supernatural.Why does the being have to be supernatural?
Natural law holds that water will flow to a more or less uniform level relative to the core of the planet. Whether water was stacked upon itself or whether there was a global flood, either case requires a circumstance that is not replicable using natural law. Since nothing in the natural world can supersede natural law, the answer must lie with the supernatural.
There is tons of evidence for the Bible. There maybe no evidence for your understanding or interpretation of the Bible. There is a reason why the Bible is still in it's first edition after 3500 years. Yet just about every text book at the university is going through constant revision. My son even has a literature book that has been revised 22 times. Whey would literature need to be revised? If you want books filled with errors, mistakes and in need of updating and revisions, go to the book store of any university anywhere. The Bible remains consistent and true.Sorry but there is no reliable evidence for that. <staff edit>
Do you know why it's so antagonistic to intelligent design? I'll give you a hint: name a hypothetical universe that would demonstrate that it wasn't intelligently designed.3. Creationist scientists might evade what you choose to call peer review because your so- called peer review has proven to be extremely antagonistic to anything that even hints at intelligent design.
Really? I haven't seen any evidence that the global flood is accurate. Care to discuss you evidence for such a flood here?There is tons of evidence that the Bible is true and that the story of Noah is accurate. This is what domestication is all about and this is how farming spread from the Middle East to the rest of the world.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?