Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, I sure can't.Can't tell from context?
No, I sure can't.
Are you saying I don't care if Latin predates English ... or English predates Latin?
Or what exactly?
Do you think I should care?That you just don't care in general.
If you say that Jacobean English came first, why should the Latin terms matter anything to you?
Do you think I should care?
Should I care that the earth came before the sun?
Hows come you guys don't do cartwheels over that?
Wouldn't I believing the earth came before the sun be more perplexing to people than believing Jacobean English came before Latin?
Not only that, I believe angiosperms came before the sun!
And ... are you ready for this doosey?
I ... I also believe this!
Jesus walked on water.
No.Does it change anything to you that records show that fetus is cognate with child in the womb, or that kind doesn't mean genus?
... probably because you didn't clarify what you meant by "evolution".Creationists claim that evolution has never been observed when, in fact, it's been observed both in the lab and the field repeatedl
According to Darwinist folklore, humans evolved from bacteria.OK. I agree, that doesn't happen - and evolutionary theory says it doesn't happen. Birds won't become mammals and mammals won't become crustaceans... classes are separate branches of the evolutionary tree.
Please be advised of my new definition of "macroevolution": One Family of organisms evolving from an existing Family of organisms....okay.
So, the variation of humans, whales, apes, rats, kangaroos and platypuses is all micro evolution because they are still in the class mammalia?
That's an unusual take for a creationist.
Take a look at Permian Synapsids, they form the transition from the common ancestors of all amniotes to what would become mammals, as opposed to the sauropsids who were ancestral to reptiles and birds.
Didn't he marry his first cousin?According to Darwinist folklore, humans evolved from bacteria.
Didn't he marry his first cousin?
It's better to rely on science than folklore. Currently, the origin of Eukaryotes (including humans) is undecided. Their cells have features of both bacteria and archaea - it's possible that they originated as an endosymbiotic combination of an early bacterium and an archaean, where the archaean cell was absorbed by a bacterial cell and became the nucleus, in much the same way as later eukaryote cells absorbed bacteria that became the mitochondria.According to Darwinist folklore, humans evolved from bacteria.
Please be advised of my new definition of "macroevolution": One Family of organisms evolving from an existing Family of organisms.
(You are the first to know, but don't let that unspeakable privilege go to your head.)
Too bad he quit his medical studies prematurely, isn't it?As did many, many, many, many people in those days and the centuries before and none of them really knew why it had the negative results that it did, until the theory of evolution explained why cousins marrying and having children is not the best idea.
Too bad he quit his medical studies prematurely, isn't it?
Perhaps THAT was what God had in mind for him? to find the medical reason to prohibit close marriages?
Microevolution.So Darwin came up with the theory of evolution which shows it perfectly why inbreeding is damaging. Maybe that's what God intended Darwin to do all along.
Microevolution.
Perhaps not. He went on to study theology, which would have let him understand why a literal reading of Genesis is not necessary to support essential Christian doctrine.Too bad he quit his medical studies prematurely, isn't it?
Welcome to CF, ottawak.Perhaps not. He went on to study theology, which would have let him understand why a literal reading of Genesis is not necessary to support essential Christian doctrine.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?