Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
For Those That Think inappropriate contentography Harms Noone
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="theeyesoftammyfaye" data-source="post: 2633317" data-attributes="member: 18535"><p>well, i don't really care that i'm incriminating myself here, so i'll say it. of the many inappropriate contentography productions i have seen, i have yet to see any modern one that didn't include condom use (those made in the late 70s/early 80s in the pre-AIDS era didn't use them.) most of the tapes i have seen also have an announcement before the film starts encouraging monogamy, or at minimum condom use. so to say people don't pay to watch people have 'safe sex' is a falsehood. </p><p></p><p>i don't think inappropriate contentography is inherently bad...for those of you worried about the addiction factor, i have to say come on. there are going to be addicts of all sorts. some get addicted to gambling. some drinking. some inappropriate contentography. some shopping. some eating. some smoking. you name an activity, i can pretty much guarantee there is an addicted person. should we ban all of them? or only the ones which seem 'immoral' to some? where do we draw the line?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="theeyesoftammyfaye, post: 2633317, member: 18535"] well, i don't really care that i'm incriminating myself here, so i'll say it. of the many inappropriate contentography productions i have seen, i have yet to see any modern one that didn't include condom use (those made in the late 70s/early 80s in the pre-AIDS era didn't use them.) most of the tapes i have seen also have an announcement before the film starts encouraging monogamy, or at minimum condom use. so to say people don't pay to watch people have 'safe sex' is a falsehood. i don't think inappropriate contentography is inherently bad...for those of you worried about the addiction factor, i have to say come on. there are going to be addicts of all sorts. some get addicted to gambling. some drinking. some inappropriate contentography. some shopping. some eating. some smoking. you name an activity, i can pretty much guarantee there is an addicted person. should we ban all of them? or only the ones which seem 'immoral' to some? where do we draw the line? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
News & Current Events (Articles Required)
For Those That Think inappropriate contentography Harms Noone
Top
Bottom