Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
For all of you "Big Bang" Believers...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cantuar" data-source="post: 768757" data-attributes="member: 3572"><p>Science is not a theory, it's a method to explain observations of natural phenomena and processes. The scientific method has not been demonstrated to be inapplicable to any aspect of that, so I don't know what you're talking about as far as it being a falsified theory. If the scientific method is used to show that one theory is a better explanation than an older version of the theory on the basis of new observations, the old theory may be falsified, but the scientific method certainly isn't. In fact it's validated every time something like that happens.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Chemically, synthetic stones are exactly the same as natural ones. These days the techniques are good enough that it's even hard to tell the stones apart microscopically. The only way that synthetic and natural stones are different is the way they were formed, not the properties they have when formed. Synthetic diamonds are now so similar to natural ones that they've got De Beers worried. Synthetic diamonds, by the way, are not the same as simulants like zirconia and moissonite, which are chemically different from diamond. Synthetic diamonds are diamonds.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cantuar, post: 768757, member: 3572"] Science is not a theory, it's a method to explain observations of natural phenomena and processes. The scientific method has not been demonstrated to be inapplicable to any aspect of that, so I don't know what you're talking about as far as it being a falsified theory. If the scientific method is used to show that one theory is a better explanation than an older version of the theory on the basis of new observations, the old theory may be falsified, but the scientific method certainly isn't. In fact it's validated every time something like that happens. Chemically, synthetic stones are exactly the same as natural ones. These days the techniques are good enough that it's even hard to tell the stones apart microscopically. The only way that synthetic and natural stones are different is the way they were formed, not the properties they have when formed. Synthetic diamonds are now so similar to natural ones that they've got De Beers worried. Synthetic diamonds, by the way, are not the same as simulants like zirconia and moissonite, which are chemically different from diamond. Synthetic diamonds are diamonds. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
For all of you "Big Bang" Believers...
Top
Bottom