Sure, you can make up whatever story you like to explain how it all got here - but unless the story has some firm basis in what we already know, or you have some way to test it, it's just mythologising.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Sure, you can make up whatever story you like to explain how it all got here - but unless the story has some firm basis in what we already know, or you have some way to test it, it's just mythologising.I'm not suggesting changing the science of what is observable. I'm suggesting the origin of what is observed is beyond the reach of science.
No, what you posted was nonsense.If is written Voynich Manuscript and the author is dead, so he can not explain. One still can not say, that it is nonsense. Any nonsense must be proven nonsense. Until the opening discovery, it is a mystery.
Atheists say, that nothing exists (because from nothing only nothing comes), but atheists do not say, that nonsense does not exist.No, what you posted was nonsense.
why would they do that..? It would just be more things to investigate.I wonder what they will do when they discover the interface between energy and spirit (I predict the mass suicide of scientists.)
Atheists don't believe in a god. That's all.Atheists say, that nothing exists (because from nothing only nothing comes), but atheists do not say, that nonsense does not exist.
I know even less about String Theory than I do about raising armadillos. (I know enough to have characterised it as mental masturbation for mathematicians. [That's string theory, not armadillo husbandry]). But I did find this comment online:
Gravitational waves, in general, present no problem to string theory. It's specifically gravitational waves in the CMBR that present a problem because of the limit they would impose on the inflation field. See this paper:http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/9606387v1.pdf.
The comment was found here. I found that using this search {gravity wave string theory conflict} on DuckDuckGo, where there may be further informative links.
"Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen (observed) were not made of things which do appear (which are observable)."
This is the only logical explanation for the origin of matter and energy.
What idol?
The war of Gods: idol of Atheists vs. God of TheistsJohn is answering:
- I do not know Him, I can not disprove Him, but there is no Him. The Loving (etc) Trinity is Not Existent.
Bob:
- Here you get it: Non-existent Loving God. It is your idol now, a mental idol is defined as demolishes thoughts about God of Theism. But my Trinity is perfectly Existent. Moreover, the Existence and Reality is defined as His Creation.
John:
- prove then the Trinity.
Bob:
do not simplify the problem of death.What!? An tetchy old diety who gets angry when someone eats his fruit? Not convinced sorry.
Bad news for all scientists everywhere, more like.Is that good news or bad news for you?
If something makes no sense to you, is it necessarily wrong? Let us check, does the 500 pages long proof of Poincare Conjecture make sense to you or doesn't?Lol! More nonsense.
If we are so good in Science, why there are so many mysteries there? UFOes, Dark Matter, lack of antimatter in Big Bang?
Sure, you can make up whatever story you like to explain how it all got here - but unless the story has some firm basis in what we already know, or you have some way to test it, it's just mythologising.
why would they do that..? It would just be more things to investigate.
"Then said I, Wisdom is better than strength: nevertheless the poor man's wisdom is despised, and his words are not heard." Ecclesiastes 9:16.
The String Theory or any other multi-dimension esoteric is totally disproven in 2018:
[1801.08160] Limits on the number of spacetime dimensions from GW170817
No? At least they have ruled out the esoteric terms: "let us enter parallel dimensions", "Big Foot is coming out parallel dimension."
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?