Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Flood, big, small or not at all???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LightBearer" data-source="post: 400784" data-attributes="member: 3849"><p>First let me say Im not knocking science it has achieved great things but if all we had to rely on for evidence was science we would have problems, since science is changing constantly according to knew knowledge. What might have been true 30 years ago is false or wrong today. This proves that science can be and is unreliable and is not worthy of my complete trust unlike the word of God. Imagine not to many years back science and no doubt you would have blindly followed said the universe had no beginning, now that has all changed. Who knows they may even go back to that belief in the not to distant future. </p><p></p><p>DID YOU KNOW THAT SCIENCE ONCE TAUGHT </p><p>1. That heat is a fluid called caloric? </p><p>2. That the atom is the smallest particle of matter, and that it was impossible to divide it? </p><p>3. That an impassable barrier between matter and energy prevented any possibility of one being changed into the other? </p><p>4. That sleep is caused when the nerve cells shrink, thereby no longer making contact with one another? </p><p></p><p>Of course, scientists have long rejected these theories and replaced them with others more consistent with the facts as they <strong>now know</strong> them. <strong>New facts</strong> <strong>discovered in the future</strong>, <strong>or different approaches to facts now in their possession</strong>, <strong>could lead to modifications, or even abandonment, of theories scientists now hold. </strong></p><p><strong></strong> </p><p>[/B] </p><p>Many evolutionists, according to Elaine Morgan, <strong>have lost confidence in the answers they thought they knew thirty years ago.</strong> Thus, it is not surprising that <strong>some of the theories</strong> held by evolutionists <strong>have collapsed. </strong></p><p><strong></strong> </p><p></p><p>So, how do you know that napoleon existed or that the crusades took place? How do you know anything about anything that happened say 100 years prior to your birth because it's all history to you?&nbsp; And dont say science because clearly from the above it's unreliable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LightBearer, post: 400784, member: 3849"] First let me say Im not knocking science it has achieved great things but if all we had to rely on for evidence was science we would have problems, since science is changing constantly according to knew knowledge. What might have been true 30 years ago is false or wrong today. This proves that science can be and is unreliable and is not worthy of my complete trust unlike the word of God. Imagine not to many years back science and no doubt you would have blindly followed said the universe had no beginning, now that has all changed. Who knows they may even go back to that belief in the not to distant future. DID YOU KNOW THAT SCIENCE ONCE TAUGHT 1. That heat is a fluid called caloric? 2. That the atom is the smallest particle of matter, and that it was impossible to divide it? 3. That an impassable barrier between matter and energy prevented any possibility of one being changed into the other? 4. That sleep is caused when the nerve cells shrink, thereby no longer making contact with one another? Of course, scientists have long rejected these theories and replaced them with others more consistent with the facts as they [B]now know[/B] them. [B]New facts[/B] [B]discovered in the future[/B], [B]or different approaches to facts now in their possession[/B], [B]could lead to modifications, or even abandonment, of theories scientists now hold. [/B] [/B] Many evolutionists, according to Elaine Morgan, [B]have lost confidence in the answers they thought they knew thirty years ago.[/B] Thus, it is not surprising that [B]some of the theories[/B] held by evolutionists [B]have collapsed. [/B] So, how do you know that napoleon existed or that the crusades took place? How do you know anything about anything that happened say 100 years prior to your birth because it's all history to you? And dont say science because clearly from the above it's unreliable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Flood, big, small or not at all???
Top
Bottom