J
jamesrwright3
Guest
LOL Terral is a joke. We post evidence. He ignores it. He has no explanation for any of it.
LOL this is funny
LOL this is funny
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Terral has no grasp of reality. He makes things up as he goes and refuses to address pictures as evidence when they clearly show plane wreckage. Its like arguing with a wall, but the wall may actually have more sense.
The on-the-scene reporters say there was nothing larger than a phone book, but the bits and pieces from your so-called evidence is larger than anything described by these reporters. These people ‘do’ mention the broken trees, which is where the debris ‘was’ found for the photo op; but where was ‘that’ debris that these reporters obviously DID NOT SEE? :0) These reporters are talking about the size of AN EMPTY HOLE that is much too small to have anything to do with any crashed 100-Ton Jetliner (pic). The second problem with your so-called ‘evidence’ is from the little part of the engine (pic) that was supposedly unearthed from the crime scene. James forgets that all the original pictures show GRASS growing on all the incline slopes (pic and pic and story) that makes anything found under that grass PLANTED evidence. Planted evidence can only mean a 9/11 Inside Job!"The debris here is spread over a 3 to 4 mile radius which has now been completely sealed off and is being treated, according to the FBI, as a crime scene.",
"No smoke, no fire",
"This is one of those cases where the pictures really do tell the story, that, sort of the most horrifying aspect of this particular crash scene is how little debris is visible.",
"There is a large crater in the ground.",
"That's really all you see is a large crater in the ground and, and, just tiny, tiny bits of debris.",
"There's been at least one report that, the uh, investigators out there, and there are hundreds of them, as I said tonight, um, have found nothing larger than a phone book."
Next, an eyewitness of the "crash" site, a photographer from the Pittsburgh Fox affiliate,
Chris Kanicky (phonetically spelled), is interviewed by another reporter, and the eyewitness says,
"The only thing you could see from where we were, uh, was a big gouge in the earth and some broken trees.",
"We could see some people working, walking around in the area, but, from where we could see, there wasn't much left."
Reporter asks, "Any large pieces of debris at all?"
"No, there was NOTHING, nothing that you could distinguish that a plane had crashed there."
Then, the reporter asks, "Smoke, fire?"
"Nothing, it was absolutely quiet, it was uh, actually very quiet, um, nothing going on down there, no smoke, no fire, just a couple of people walking around, they looked like part of the NTSB crew, walking around, looking at the pieces."
Reporter: "How big would you say that hole was?"
"Uh, from my estimates I would guess it was probably about 20 to 15 feet, uh, long, and probably about 10 feet long", (he says accidentally, and then corrects himself), "or, 10 feet wide."
"What could you see on the ground, other than dirt and ash?"
"You couldn't see anything, you could just see dirt, ash,
and people walking around, broken trees."
That's the stuff conspiracy theories are made of. Prove them wrong undeniably, and they merely go into hibernation to resurface later as though never proved wrong at all.LOL Terral is a joke. We post evidence. He ignores it. He has no explanation for any of it.
LOL this is funny
Hi James:
No luck finding a picture of a crashed 100-ton Jetliner yet? :0)
Posting that photo over and over isn't going to do it, Terral.
You have no explanation for Flight 93, its passengers, the DNA evidence, the flight data, the passenger phone calls, and eyewitness testimony. The official version explains ALL of those things. Your claim that there were 'no pieces of Flight 93 anywhere on the net' is also blatantly false. Your accusation of exploding ditches and trash dumping is also without a single shred of evidence.
Another point the conspiracy theorists miss is that, if there was real, substantive evidence of a U.S. government plot vis-a-vis 9/11, don't you think the Chinese government would be all over that? As demonstrated by the blind eye it turns toward the carnage in Africa, China's government would support Lucifer himself freshly risen from Hell and reeking of sulfur if somehow doing so worked against America. Russia is almost as obstructionist.
Not to mention a reason why "Senor Bushie" would want to fake a crashed plane in the middle of freaking nowhere.
Seriously, what did that accomplish? Nothing.
Only....we forgot to plant weapons of mass destruction. Damn, and after all that planning on 9/11! D'oh!
Btodd
That's the stuff conspiracy theories are made of. Prove them wrong undeniably, and they merely go into hibernation to resurface later as though never proved wrong at all.
If you disagree with Terral and his speculations, then produce evidence or reasoning to the contrary... don't ridicule him. It's low by debating standards.
There is no official conspiracy theory.By that logic, that must also be the stuff the official conspiracy theory is made of.
In his view, it's up to others to prove that the evidence wasn't plantedOh, and some advice to Terral... I've heard you say that Senor Bush planted evidence. However, that is pure speculation and will be regarded as such until you can produce evidence that substantiates it. No-one is going to believe pure speculation unless there is reasoning or substance behind it.
The only thing he is going to accept is if someone produces a photo of a Boeing 757 at the crash scene. That won't happen because the plane disintegrated. The scene of the crash looks clean because that is wht the NTSB does at crash sites. They clean up the debris and take it to a location where they can hopefully reconstruct the aircraft and examine the pieces to determine the casue of the accident.And to others who continue to persist in throwing out meaningless ad hom attacks... please... ridicule and reason are two totally different things and ridicule does not substitute for reason. If you disagree with Terral and his speculations, then produce evidence or reasoning to the contrary... don't ridicule him. It's low by debating standards.
If you disagree with Terral and his speculations, then produce evidence or reasoning to the contrary... don't ridicule him. It's low by debating standards.
There is no official conspiracy theory.
In his view, it's up to others to prove that the evidence wasn't planted
The only thing he is going to accept is if someone produces a photo of a Boeing 757 at the crash scene. That won't happen because the plane disintegrated. The scene of the crash looks clean because that is wht the NTSB does at crash sites. They clean up the debris and take it to a location where they can hopefully reconstruct the aircraft and examine the pieces to determine the casue of the accident.
That would be true, if I had any desire to debate truthers. Which I don't.
No, I contend it was a conspiracy ACT
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?