Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
Forums
New posts
Forum list
Search forums
Leaderboards
Games
Our Blog
Blogs
New entries
New comments
Blog list
Search blogs
Credits
Transactions
Shop
Blessings: ✟0.00
Tickets
Open new ticket
Watched
Donate
Log in
Register
Search
Search titles only
By:
Search titles only
By:
More options
Toggle width
Share this page
Share this page
Share
Reddit
Pinterest
Tumblr
WhatsApp
Email
Share
Link
Menu
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Fish Raised on Land Evolve in One Generation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Loudmouth" data-source="post: 66259977" data-attributes="member: 11790"><p>Citation?</p><p></p><p>Did they show that a mutation at every position in the gene results in a non-functional or deleterious allele?</p><p></p><p>Added in edit: It appears that GRN stands for gene regulation networks. Assuming this is the case, I thought it might be interesting to look at one of the human homeobox genes. The following page lists the known variants of the human Hox4I:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://uswest.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Gene/Variation_Gene/Image?family=ENSFM00250000001319;g=ENSG00000128714;r=2:176092891-176095938;t=ENST00000392539" target="_blank">Ensembl genome browser 76: Homo sapiens - Variation image - Gene: HOXD13 (ENSG00000128714)</a></p><p></p><p>There are quite a few missense mutations on top of synonymous mutations. So much for there being no mutations in these genes.</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p>We have plenty of pages here at CF where creationists demand that laws were different in the past. It is quite strange to hear creationists demanding abiogenesis be observed in the lab, all the while rejecting decay rates and geologic mechanisms that are directly observed in the lab and in the field. Some consistency would be nice.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Loudmouth, post: 66259977, member: 11790"] Citation? Did they show that a mutation at every position in the gene results in a non-functional or deleterious allele? Added in edit: It appears that GRN stands for gene regulation networks. Assuming this is the case, I thought it might be interesting to look at one of the human homeobox genes. The following page lists the known variants of the human Hox4I: [url=http://uswest.ensembl.org/Homo_sapiens/Gene/Variation_Gene/Image?family=ENSFM00250000001319;g=ENSG00000128714;r=2:176092891-176095938;t=ENST00000392539]Ensembl genome browser 76: Homo sapiens - Variation image - Gene: HOXD13 (ENSG00000128714)[/url] There are quite a few missense mutations on top of synonymous mutations. So much for there being no mutations in these genes. We have plenty of pages here at CF where creationists demand that laws were different in the past. It is quite strange to hear creationists demanding abiogenesis be observed in the lab, all the while rejecting decay rates and geologic mechanisms that are directly observed in the lab and in the field. Some consistency would be nice. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Discussion and Debate
Discussion and Debate
Physical & Life Sciences
Creation & Evolution
Fish Raised on Land Evolve in One Generation
Top
Bottom