Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
There is an investigation. It is right in the article.Maybe we should wait until there is a conviction before we get to the name calling?
Right now, there is not even an investigation that we know of.
Oh, my bad. Then certainly because there is an investigation we can judge him guilty and call him every derogatory name we can think of.There is an investigation. It is right in the article.
Conversation around here does not equate to proof many times. Both sides skew info to support their agenda.Their breakout hit again ACORN was dishonest as were a number of their other “stings” (successful or not) and they’ve lost a number of lawsuits because of their dishonesty. Their wikipedia page gives a good rundown, but you’ve been around here long enough to have come across some of the discussions about them; I’m not going to rehash all of it.
Sounds a lot better than Pirro.What's new, the Biden FBI knocked down Journalist James O'Keefe's door and took his journalistic work unlawfully
Westchester DA Miriam Rocah is a liberal democrat who was spawned and supported by the liberal southern district in New York, Ex MSNBC commentator who strongly disliked president Trump, nothing more than political, liberal, prosecution in "political activism"
Endorsements: Hillary Clinton,
Congressman Hakeem Jeffries,
Chairman, House Democratic Caucus
Lohud
Former MSNBC commentator Mimi Rocah hits $325K mark in Westchester DA campaign
Jan 14, 2020
Rocah jumped into the race while an MSNBC commentator known to rail against President Donald Trump.
The Hudson Independent
Mimi Rocah Sworn In as New Westchester County DA
Jan 4, 2021
–pay increased attention to immigrant rights, including establishment of an anonymous hotline to report wage theft and workplace abuse;
–availability of Spanish language versions of all official statements from the office, as well as use of a sign language interpreter;
–an emphasis on improving diversity and inclusion in the office, addressing underrepresentation of people of color and women, and a zero-tolerance internal sexual harassment policy;
These goals, she acknowledged, would not be reached overnight or easily. Quoting one of her heroines, the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, she noted that “enduring change happens one step at a time.”
He was fired from Project Veritas for "financial malfeasance". That's a red flag in my book.Oh, my bad. Then certainly because there is an investigation we can judge him guilty and call him every derogatory name we can think of.
Innocent until proven guilty. Pffft …..
AP said:In a statement released later Monday, the group’s board of directors said it had uncovered “financial malfeasance” and accused O’Keefe of spending “an excessive amount of donor funds in the last three years on personal luxuries.”
You know he did something wrong when the ultra right-wing attack project has to fire their own leader. LOLHe was fired from Project Veritas for "financial malfeasance". That's a red flag in my book.
Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe out at right-wing org
Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe said in a speech posted online that he has been removed as the right-wing group’s leader.apnews.com
Then he is definitely guilty until proven innocent - go ahead and call him every derogatory name in the book -He was fired from Project Veritas for "financial malfeasance". That's a red flag in my book.
Project Veritas founder James O'Keefe out at right-wing org
Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe said in a speech posted online that he has been removed as the right-wing group’s leader.apnews.com
Oh no thanks! I'll just stick to the ones that apply.Then he is definitely guilty until proven innocent - go ahead and call him every derogatory name in the book -
One like accused and presumed innocent?Oh no thanks! I'll just stick to the ones that apply.
Your own good sense and a court of law are not the same thing.Then he is definitely guilty until proven innocent....
Oh, my bad. Then certainly because there is an investigation we can judge him guilty and call him every derogatory name we can think of.
Innocent until proven guilty. Pffft …..
I never claimed Joe was guilty, nor have I called him derogatory names like the ones I am addressing.This is even odder coming from someone who claims Biden is guilty prior to any type of trial, and has no issue calling Biden pretty much every derogatory name that can be thought of.
As hislegacy has stated several times, the "alleged" crimes have yet to be heard and determined, sit tight until then , Smiles!Who declared him guilty? The quote I saw was "possibly embezzling" -- sounds to me that an investigation into possible embezzling is evidence that he was "possibly embezzling."
I never claimed Joe was guilty, nor have I called him derogatory names like the ones I am addressing.
Thanks for the call out and attempt
As hislegacy has stated several times, the "alleged" crimes have yet to be heard and determined, sit tight until then , Smiles!
Innocent until proven guilty, God Bless America, And The Constitution that guides herI've not seen anyone on this thread say anything different -- though maybe I missed something -- and I've never claimed it was more than alleged. Again, the quote that was being referred to was "possibly embezzling."
If “proven guilty” then what?Innocent until proven guilty, God Bless America, And The Constitution that guides her
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?